The efficiency of nano-electrospray ionization, defined as the flux of ions reaching the detector of a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer divided by the flux of analyte ions leaving the needle, has been measured in a series of controlled experiments with dodecyltrimethyl ammonium (DDTMA) bromide, myoglobin, Glu-[1]-fibrinopeptide, and gramicidin S. By varying the flow rate from each needle, the optimum efficiency was determined. In general, the efficiency increased as the flow rate decreased. For DDTMA, efficiencies of up to 12% were measured, although efficiencies of ϳ1% were more common. Ion current measurements indicated efficient transfer of ions from the needle through to the detector. Significant needle-to-needle variations in efficiency were encountered and attributed to variations in ion-generation efficiency. ano-electrospray ionization (nano-ESI) is generally recognized as the most efficient method of introducing a liquid sample for direct analysis by mass spectrometry. Broadly speaking, nano-ESI is a form of electrospray, with the same fundamental ionization process of droplet formation followed by multiple uneven Rayleigh divisions, and finally desorption of pre-formed ions from the droplet [1, 2]. The technique is distinguished from more conventional forms of electrospray by the fashion in which it is carried out. One to two microliters of sample is deposited into a glass or quartz tube that has a tip diameter in the order of 1 m, and is sprayed from the tip by applying a voltage to the solution. The actual flow rate is usually a few nL/min to a few tens of nL/min, controlled by the diameter of the tip, the voltage applied, and the backpressure which is sometimes applied to the tube content. have nicely shown that, in comparison with electrospray, nano-ESI reduces interference effects from salts and other species and provides better sensitivity toward a variety of analytes, including peptides and oligosaccharides, in samples contaminated by high levels of salts. They attributed this to the reduced droplet size compared with electrospray at higher flow rates. Nano-ESI is typically used for peptide and protein analysis because of the ability to analyze a small volume of sample, and to make the sample last for many minutes so that various experiments can be performed. Noncovalent complexes are usually analyzed by nano-ESI, partly because of the small sample volumes which are typically available, but also because it is widely assumed to work better than electrospray for large complexes in aqueous solvents at low or neutral pH, although we are not aware of any systematic experiment that has demonstrated this fact.The defining characteristic of low flow is assumed to be responsible for the beneficial effect of high ionization and sampling efficiency, presumably because the droplets are very small and therefore can become well desolvated, given the experimental conditions employed. The overall efficiency can be determined by comparing the ion flux at the detector measured in ion counts per second at the...