2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-chemo-mechanical signature of conventional oil-well cement systems: Effects of elevated temperature and curing time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of silica flour (S1-S3) with 3.25 -63.13 µm median particle sizes effectively mitigates the strength This result means that silica flour has participated in the pozzolanic reaction and likely changed the composition of hydrated phases [25]. In the previous literature, 35 % BWOC was recommended as the optimal incorporation of silica flour, suggesting that values above this one lead to worse strength degradation-combating effects, which is consistent with the results of the samples with silica flour S1 and S3 incorporation but not with those of the sample modified with silica flour S2 [26,27]. To further evaluate the abnormal phenomena, we prolonged the curing time to 28 days for samples with 67 % BWOC silica flour S2 incorporation.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of silica flour (S1-S3) with 3.25 -63.13 µm median particle sizes effectively mitigates the strength This result means that silica flour has participated in the pozzolanic reaction and likely changed the composition of hydrated phases [25]. In the previous literature, 35 % BWOC was recommended as the optimal incorporation of silica flour, suggesting that values above this one lead to worse strength degradation-combating effects, which is consistent with the results of the samples with silica flour S1 and S3 incorporation but not with those of the sample modified with silica flour S2 [26,27]. To further evaluate the abnormal phenomena, we prolonged the curing time to 28 days for samples with 67 % BWOC silica flour S2 incorporation.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparing the compressive strengths of the samples in Figures 3c and 3b subjected to 260 °C and 21 MPa between 28 days and 7 days, the strengths of the samples with 43 % BWOC silica flour S1, S2 and S3 incorporation decrease 4.8 %, 11.6 % and 22.6 %, respectively. This result indicates that the optimal particle size of silica flour should be 63.13 µm (median particle size of S1), which is coarser than the universally adopted 325 mesh (45 µm) [1,8,26,27], suggesting that very fine silica flour may not be a good choice for the anti-retrogression performance of cement slurry in the HTHP environment. The samples with 43 % and 67 % BWOC silica flour S2 incorporation show 11.6 % and 31.8 % compressive strength loss after curing at HTHP from 7 to 28 days because the higher silica flour amounts exceed the amount required for the reaction [28].…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2A, we plot the scattering intensity computed from the simulation data (Materials and Methods) for η = 0.33 and η = 0.52 and the SANS data from ref. 28. Apart from the lowest wave vectors (where the simulations data are limited by the system size), the curves can be readily compared, having considered that the calculations are in real physical units but that the signals are not expected to match exactly because of the presence of other hydration products in the experiments (e.g., ettringite, Portlandite, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an established chemical strategy, fine crystalline silica stabilizer is added to avert the strength deterioration of Portland cement when exposed to ultra-high temperature [12]. Portland cement has calcium oxide to silicon dioxide (C/S) ratio close to 3.1 but upon addition of extra quantity of silica (typical dosage~35% bwoc) [13,14] decreases the ratio close to 1.0, desirable for the stable formation of non-retrogressing stronger cement at temperature above~230 F (110 C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%