2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano carbon containing MgO-C refractory: Effect of graphite content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of the increased filling of pores, resulting in an increase in compaction and densification and results in higher strength values in both batches. The CCS value increased up to 1 wt% nanocarbon due to better filling of pores by the finer particles, after that addition of nanocarbon resulting lower CCS due to higher volume fraction with low density …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is because of the increased filling of pores, resulting in an increase in compaction and densification and results in higher strength values in both batches. The CCS value increased up to 1 wt% nanocarbon due to better filling of pores by the finer particles, after that addition of nanocarbon resulting lower CCS due to higher volume fraction with low density …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows that cured density has increased with the increase in nanocarbon black content due to better pore filling, resulting in a better compaction up to 1 wt% of nanocarbon black addition for both the 5 and the 3 wt% graphite‐containing batches and reaches a maximum density value of 2.96 g/cm 3 and 2.99 g/cm 3 , respectively. Further increase in the nanocarbon black does not result in further filling of the pore volume, but the bulk volume has increased due to the excess amount of finer particles present, thereby reducing the density values in both the batch . Three weight percent graphite‐containing composition has little higher density value compared to that of 5 wt% graphite one, due to the presence of higher amount of denser magnesia and less amount of graphite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it is still technically difficult to make carbon‐containing castables with high levels of carbon, some low carbon castables, eg, Al 2 O 3 ‐SiC‐C castables, have already been used extensively in some important areas, in particular, in blast furnace troughs . Flake graphite (FG) is a common choice for preparation of carbon‐containing castables owing to its good slag resistance, high thermal conductivity, and satisfactory oxidation resistance . However, it has a poor water‐wettability, which increases the water‐demand for castable casting and decreases the mechanical strength of the final castables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%