2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/bibm49941.2020.9313329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NANet: Nuclei-Aware Network for Grading of Breast Cancer in HE Stained Pathological Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall patch-wise classification performance of the DANet is demonstrated by the confusion matrix and ROC curve, as shown in Figures 5c and 6c. Methods (BC-Grading) Accuracy (%) AUC Wan et al [10] 69.0 -Yan et al [11] 92.2 0.92 ResNet50 [48] 81.3 0.83 Xception [40] 81.8 0.85 Ours (DANet) 91.6 0.91…”
Section: Nuclei Segmentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall patch-wise classification performance of the DANet is demonstrated by the confusion matrix and ROC curve, as shown in Figures 5c and 6c. Methods (BC-Grading) Accuracy (%) AUC Wan et al [10] 69.0 -Yan et al [11] 92.2 0.92 ResNet50 [48] 81.3 0.83 Xception [40] 81.8 0.85 Ours (DANet) 91.6 0.91…”
Section: Nuclei Segmentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy (%) AUC Awan et al [44] 90.66 -Hou et al [50] 92.12 -Shaban et al [49] 95.70 -ResNet50 [48] For the three-class BC grading, the state-of-the-art method Nuclei-Aware Network (NANet) was proposed by Yan et al [11], which can learn more nuclei-related features. It…”
Section: Methods (Crc-grading)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In related works, previous approaches have been proposed for automatic histologic grading, including the use of various segmentation techniques, feature sets, group labeling conventions, and classification models [ 36 , 46 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. Wan et al, examined 106 breast tumors and employed a hybrid active contour method to carry out segmentation tasks, using global and local image information [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to histologic grade labels, applying a fixed threshold (0.8) showed an accuracy of 82% for detecting high-grade tumors [ 36 ]. Similarly, Yan et al, implemented an end-to-end computational pipeline, first using a deep learning framework for nuclear segmentation, then a Nuclei-Aware Network (NaNet) consisting of a VGG16 (Visual Geometry Group 16) backbone for feature representation learning [ 63 ]. Their results showed high classification accuracy (92.2%) from the model to distinguish each Nottingham category [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%