2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Name No Names: The Role of the Media in Reporting Mass Shootings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the coverage of perpetrators is negative in tone, it may still have many unintended consequences, such as making mass killings—as potential opportunities to become famous—and mass killers—as de facto celebrities—more appealing to a small fraction of audience members. The role of contagion and copycat effects as consequences of media coverage of mass killers has been heavily documented in the scholarly literature (Follman & Andrews, 2015; Gould & Olivares, 2017; Helfgott, 2015; Kissner, 2016; Langman, 2017; Lankford, 2016; Lankford & Madfis, 2018; Meindl & Ivy, 2017; Murray, 2017; Perrin, 2016; Sidhu, 2017; Towers, Gomez-Lievano, Khan, Mubayi, & Castillo-Chavez, 2015). Of course, psychologically healthy people do not commit mass shootings based on what they read or see in the news, but there are troubled and at-risk individuals who respond very differently (Follman & Andrews, 2015; Gould & Olivares, 2017; Helfgott, 2015; Langman, 2017; Lankford, 2016, 2018; Murray, 2017; Perrin, 2016; Sidhu, 2017).…”
Section: The Consequences Of Media Coverage Of Mass Killingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the coverage of perpetrators is negative in tone, it may still have many unintended consequences, such as making mass killings—as potential opportunities to become famous—and mass killers—as de facto celebrities—more appealing to a small fraction of audience members. The role of contagion and copycat effects as consequences of media coverage of mass killers has been heavily documented in the scholarly literature (Follman & Andrews, 2015; Gould & Olivares, 2017; Helfgott, 2015; Kissner, 2016; Langman, 2017; Lankford, 2016; Lankford & Madfis, 2018; Meindl & Ivy, 2017; Murray, 2017; Perrin, 2016; Sidhu, 2017; Towers, Gomez-Lievano, Khan, Mubayi, & Castillo-Chavez, 2015). Of course, psychologically healthy people do not commit mass shootings based on what they read or see in the news, but there are troubled and at-risk individuals who respond very differently (Follman & Andrews, 2015; Gould & Olivares, 2017; Helfgott, 2015; Langman, 2017; Lankford, 2016, 2018; Murray, 2017; Perrin, 2016; Sidhu, 2017).…”
Section: The Consequences Of Media Coverage Of Mass Killingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that this influence is complex and includes the analysis of individual, situational, media, social, and cultural characteristics, among others. More recent works are trying to study the existence or not of these effects in other types of violent acts or crimes such as mass killings [33–36], robberies [37], terrorist acts [38, 39] or shootings [40, 41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, copycat violence and contagion effects have become a major research focus (Follman, 2019; Helfgott, 2015; Kissner, 2016; Langman, 2018; Lankford & Madfis, 2018; Meindl & Ivy, 2018; Sidhu, 2017; Towers et al, 2015), but little attention has been paid to how much violent role models and copycats resemble each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on copycat violence and contagion effects has primarily focused on a few key issues. For instance, scholars have established that high profile perpetrators can inspire and influence subsequent perpetrators (Follman, 2019; Helfgott, 2015; Langman, 2018); that high profile incidents may increase the likelihood of subsequent incidents (Kissner, 2016; Towers et al, 2015); and that outsized media coverage of perpetrators makes these effects more likely (Lankford & Madfis, 2018; Meindl & Ivy, 2018; Sidhu, 2017).…”
Section: Thresholds Of Violencementioning
confidence: 99%