2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nadolol decreases the incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias during exercise stress testing compared with β1-selective β-blockers in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Abstract: The incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias decreased during treatment with nadolol compared with during treatment with β1-selective β-blockers. β1-Selective β-blockers did not change the occurrence or severity of arrhythmias compared with no medication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Nadolol was also associated with a lower maximum heart rate and arrhythmia score compared with β1-selective β-blockers. A possible explanation for the favorable effect could be that nadolol has a more pronounced chronotropic effect than other types of β-blockers.…”
Section: Electrophysiological and Genetic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48 Nadolol was also associated with a lower maximum heart rate and arrhythmia score compared with β1-selective β-blockers. A possible explanation for the favorable effect could be that nadolol has a more pronounced chronotropic effect than other types of β-blockers.…”
Section: Electrophysiological and Genetic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even though no robust comparison between the efficacy of the different type of β-blockers has been performed, reports indicate that the unselective β-blocker nadolol may be superior to other types of β-blockers. 7, 48 Hayashi et al observed lower cardiac event rates in patients treated with nadolol compared with other β-blockers and found that treatment with another type of β -blocker then nadolol was an independent risk factor for cardiac events (hazard ratio 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-8.38; P=0.02). 7 Of note, that study did not indicate which type and dose of β-blocker the patients who were not on nadolol were receiving.…”
Section: β-Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who received appropriate shock therapy were younger than those that did not. In 2015, Leren et al showed that the non-selective beta-blocker nadolol reduced exercise test-related arrhythmic events compared with β-1-selective beta-blockers 25. The same effect has been demonstrated with flecainide in 2011 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We cannot rule out that fewer shock episodes would have occurred in our cohort if other medical antiarrhythmic treatment had been used. However, 88% of the shock episodes were prior to the study by Leren et al 25 Finally, only six shock episodes were received after flecainide was proven to be effective in preventing ventricular arrhythmias in CPVT 22. Fifty per cent of these shocks were first shock received by the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of 9 events did not occur during athletic competition. Additional contributors included medication noncompliance, a missed dose, or use of metoprolol, which has recently been shown to be inferior to nadolol in a population who received both medications(5). Simply put, no events would have been prevented by activity restriction, and 4 of 9 events are not readily explicable, especially without the granularity of timing of medication dose, intercurrent illness, and other modulators of autonomic tone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%