2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-44927-7_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

nADICO: A Nested Grammar of Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a form of content analysis that has been used to analyse and compare multiple sets of rules (Basurto et al 2009;Siddiki et al 2011Siddiki et al , 2012Frantz et al 2013). It makes it possible to distinguish between different types of institutional statements, labelling them as strategies, norms, and rules according to the elements of the grammar used in each case (Basurto et al 2009).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a form of content analysis that has been used to analyse and compare multiple sets of rules (Basurto et al 2009;Siddiki et al 2011Siddiki et al , 2012Frantz et al 2013). It makes it possible to distinguish between different types of institutional statements, labelling them as strategies, norms, and rules according to the elements of the grammar used in each case (Basurto et al 2009).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Compensation example above illustrates how to achieve coherent interactions without a central authority [6,14,15]. Governance is a prerequisite for accountability and trust, which are means with which to balance autonomy and correctness.…”
Section: Meaningful Trust and Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We borrow the structure of Nested ADICO (nADICO) [10], a refined variant of the original institutional grammar, to decompose complex institutional functions into a simple set of prescriptions that can be linked using the logical operators and, or, and xor to express conjunctions, inclusive disjunctions and exclusive disjunctions.…”
Section: Institutional Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%