“…Although a limited amount of literature is available (such as, Godts et al, 2012Godts et al, , 2014Godts et al, , 2017Godts et al, , 2021De Clercq et al, 2014;Heinrichs and Azzam, 2015;De Clercq and Godts, 2016;Laue et al, 2017;Menéndez, 2017Menéndez, , 2018Gibeaux et al, 2018;Gómez-Laserna et al, 2018;Godts and Hayen, 2019;Godts and Clercq, 2020;Scatigno et al, 2021;Chabas et al, 2022;Pintér, 2022), it is important to note that its use is mostly undocumented in peer-reviewed literature; for example, in Belgium the software has been used for over 300 heritage sites (Godts et al, 2022a). Like any model, ECOS and RUNSALT have limitations and pitfalls, with ineffective or non-existent transfer from research to practice, a challenge faced more widely in heritage science, as recently explored by Richards and Brimblecombe (2022).…”