2017
DOI: 10.1515/math-2017-0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nabla inequalities and permanence for a logistic integrodifferential equation on time scales

Abstract: In this paper, by using the theory of calculus on time scales and some mathematical methods, several nabla dynamic inequalities on time scales are established. As an application, we apply the obtained results to a logistic integrodi erential equation on time scales and su cient conditions for the permanence of the equation are derived. Finally, numerical examples together with their simulations are presented to illustrate the feasibility and e ectiveness of the results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that inequality (48) and the delta inequality (15) obtained for the delta time scale calculus coincide. Therefore Theorem 15 is the diamond alpha unification of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Case R ≤ 0 < Q mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that inequality (48) and the delta inequality (15) obtained for the delta time scale calculus coincide. Therefore Theorem 15 is the diamond alpha unification of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Case R ≤ 0 < Q mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[35][36][37][38][39][40] For some results about the nabla differential equations and nabla inequalities, see previous works. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] Contrary to delta case, Bennett-Leindler type inequalities had not been considered until the paper 52 appeared. The nabla time scale unifications of the discrete Bennett-Leindler inequalities (9) and (10) and the continuous Bennett-Leindler inequalities ( 13) and ( 14) as well as the nabla versions of Theorems 1-4 for an arbitrary time scale can be seen in the next theorems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%