This comprehensive
Review focuses on the key challenges and recent
progress regarding sodium-metal anodes employed in sodium-metal batteries
(SMBs). The metal anode is the essential component of emerging energy
storage systems such as sodium sulfur and sodium selenium, which are
discussed as example full-cell applications. We begin with a description
of the differences in the chemical and physical properties of Na metal
versus the oft-studied Li metal, and a corresponding discussion regarding
the number of ways in which Na does not follow Li-inherited paradigms
in its electrochemical behavior. We detail the major challenges for
Na-metal systems that at this time limit the feasibility of SMBs.
The core Na anode problems are the following interrelated degradation
mechanisms: An unstable solid electrolyte interphase with most organic
electrolytes, “mossy” and “lath-like”
metal dendrite growth for liquid systems, poor Coulombic efficiency,
and gas evolution. Even solid-state Na batteries are not immune, with
metal dendrites being reported. The solutions may be subdivided into
the following interrelated taxonomy: Improved electrolytes and electrolyte
additives tailored for Na-metal anodes, interfacial engineering between
the metal and the liquid or solid electrolyte, electrode architectures
that both reduce the current density during plating–stripping
and serve as effective hosts that shield the Na metal from excessive
reactions, and alloy design to tune the bulk properties of the metal
per se. For instance, stable plating–stripping of Na is extremely
difficult with conventional carbonate solvents but has been reported
with ethers and glymes. Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) such as beta-alumina
solid electrolyte (BASE), sodium superionic conductor (NASICON), and
sodium thiophosphate (75Na2S·25P2S5) present highly exciting opportunities for SMBs that avoid
the dangers of flammable liquids. Even SSEs are not immune to dendrites,
however, which grow through the defects in the bulk pellet, but may
be controlled through interfacial energy modification. We conclude
with a discussion of the key research areas that we feel are the most
fruitful for further pursuit. In our opinion, greatly improved understanding
and control of the SEI structure is the key to cycling stability.
A holistic approach involving complementary post-mortem, in
situ, and operando analyses to elucidate
full battery cell level structure–performance relations is
advocated.