1981
DOI: 10.1086/159352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N70 - A mass-loss bubble within a massive collapsing H I cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a typical mass for giant molecular clouds from which associations can be formed. A similar result was found by Dopita et al (1981) for shell N70 (diameter » 120pc) in the LMC.…”
Section: On the Nature Of The Giant Envelope Around Stellar Assosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is a typical mass for giant molecular clouds from which associations can be formed. A similar result was found by Dopita et al (1981) for shell N70 (diameter » 120pc) in the LMC.…”
Section: On the Nature Of The Giant Envelope Around Stellar Assosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, the nebular emission-line properties might be comparable to DEM L323, except now varying the parameter of morphology. Dopita et al (1981) found that the nebular emission is largely consistent with photoionization as the dominant excitation mechanism, rather than shocks. However, Lasker (1977) and Skelton et al (1999) suggest a limited contribution by shock heating to resolve discrepancies that are apparent in the lower-ionization species.…”
Section: Photoionization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To correct for this effect, post-observation "spectral flat fields" were made using images of the Orion nebula that were taken with fixed-wavelength interference filters (Walter et al 1992) Reddening corrections were determined based on Oey's spectroscopy and photometry of stars in LH 114 (the association inside N70); her median E(B − V )=0.06 (Oey 1996a) was used with reddening coefficients from Mathis (1990) (R V = 3.1) to determine the interstellar reddening and extinction (0.2 magnitudes in V ). When comparing line ratios, it is worth noting that Dopita et al (1981) used A V = 0.6 magnitudes, which over-corrects in the blue.…”
Section: Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, of course, assumes that the motions observed in N70 are in fact due to expansion, which Dopita et al (1981) contests. Kinematics of N70 have been observed by Dopita et al (1981), Rosado et al (1981), Blades et al (1980), Georgelin et al (1983), and Lasker (1977), yielding velocity dispersions of order 40 km s −1 but differing conclusions regarding the overall velocity field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%