2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N2O emissions from full-scale nitrifying biofilters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these studies were not specifically focused on temperature and other side parameters affected the emissions. On the one hand, Bollon et al (2016) found that PFtot (based on the N-oxidized) from full-scale nitrifying biofilters performing complete nitrification were higher in the winter campaign (PFtot = 4.9 ± 0.5% at 15 °C) than in the summer campaign (PFtot = 2.3 ± 0.5% at 22.5 °C), which contrasts with the results of the present study. However, they suggested that the negative influence of temperature on emissions was not related to the temperature itself, but to the low DO and high nitrite concentrations occurred in winter, which enhance N2O production.…”
Section: In Supportingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, these studies were not specifically focused on temperature and other side parameters affected the emissions. On the one hand, Bollon et al (2016) found that PFtot (based on the N-oxidized) from full-scale nitrifying biofilters performing complete nitrification were higher in the winter campaign (PFtot = 4.9 ± 0.5% at 15 °C) than in the summer campaign (PFtot = 2.3 ± 0.5% at 22.5 °C), which contrasts with the results of the present study. However, they suggested that the negative influence of temperature on emissions was not related to the temperature itself, but to the low DO and high nitrite concentrations occurred in winter, which enhance N2O production.…”
Section: In Supportingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There was a huge variability on N2O emissions values reported in literature, ranging from 1.5% (Rathnayake et al, 2013) to 11% (Desloover et al, 2011) of the ammonium oxidized emitted as N2O. This variability was due to differences in reactor configurations, type of influent, conditions applied and even the methodology used for quantifying emissions (Bollon et al, 2016). In the case of PN/A systems at mainstream conditions, to the best of the authors' knowledge, only Wang et al (2016b) and Reino et al (2016) reported N2O gas emissions of a nitritation reactor treating a low-strength synthetic influent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonality is also supported by the findings of several other studies (Brotto et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2014). Bollon et al (2016a)Bollon et al, (2016b and Bollon et al…”
Section: Duration Of Monitoring Campaigns and Seasonalitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Heterotrophic denitrification and nitrifier denitrification produce N 2 O from nitrite reduction conducted by denitrifiers and ammonium oxidizers, respectively. Temperature, and electron donor and acceptor concentrations have been identified to control N 2 O emissions from WRRFs (Bollon et al, 2016;Kampschreur et al, 2009;Tumendelger et al, 2014Tumendelger et al, , 2016Wunderlin et al, 2012). These variables may induce N 2 O accumulation due to inhibition or disturbance of enzyme activity (Betlach and Tiedje, 1981;Kim et al, 2008;Otte et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%