Abstract:P. Hall introduced the notion of isoclinism between two groups more than 60 years ago. Successively, many authors have extended such a notion in different contexts. The present paper deals with the notion of relative n-isoclinism, given by N. S. Hekster in 1986, and with the notion of n-th relative nilpotency degree, recently introduced in literature.
“…The techniques of proof are straightforward applications of (2.3) and the details are omitted. However, it is good to note that Corollary 2.2 shows the stability with respect to forming direct products of spd(G): this fact was proved in [3,4,6,7,10,12,13,17] in different contexts. Another basic property is to relate spd(G) to quotients and subgroups of G.…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The following notion has analogies with [6, Definitions 2.1,3.1,4.1] and [12, Equation 1.1] and will be treated as in [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13,17].…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several contributions on d(G) in [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13]. The main strategy of investigation is to begin with the case of equality at 1 and then describe the situation, when we leave this extremal case.…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we will describe a notion of probability on L(G), beginning from groups in which the subgroups in sn(G) permutes with those in M(G). The generality of the methods (we follow [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13,17]) may be translated in terms of arbitrary sublattices, satisfying a prescribed restriction. Section 3 shows some consequences on the size of |L(G)|.…”
The so-called subgroup commutativity degree sd(G) of a finite group G is the number of permuting subgroups (H, K) ∈ L(G) × L(G), where L(G) is the subgroup lattice of G, divided by |L(G)| 2 . It allows us to measure how G is far from the celebrated classification of quasihamiltonian groups of K. Iwasawa. Here we generalize sd(G), looking at suitable sublattices of L(G), and show some new lower bounds.
“…The techniques of proof are straightforward applications of (2.3) and the details are omitted. However, it is good to note that Corollary 2.2 shows the stability with respect to forming direct products of spd(G): this fact was proved in [3,4,6,7,10,12,13,17] in different contexts. Another basic property is to relate spd(G) to quotients and subgroups of G.…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The following notion has analogies with [6, Definitions 2.1,3.1,4.1] and [12, Equation 1.1] and will be treated as in [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13,17].…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several contributions on d(G) in [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13]. The main strategy of investigation is to begin with the case of equality at 1 and then describe the situation, when we leave this extremal case.…”
Section: Measure Theory On Subgroup Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we will describe a notion of probability on L(G), beginning from groups in which the subgroups in sn(G) permutes with those in M(G). The generality of the methods (we follow [3,4,6,7,10,11,12,13,17]) may be translated in terms of arbitrary sublattices, satisfying a prescribed restriction. Section 3 shows some consequences on the size of |L(G)|.…”
The so-called subgroup commutativity degree sd(G) of a finite group G is the number of permuting subgroups (H, K) ∈ L(G) × L(G), where L(G) is the subgroup lattice of G, divided by |L(G)| 2 . It allows us to measure how G is far from the celebrated classification of quasihamiltonian groups of K. Iwasawa. Here we generalize sd(G), looking at suitable sublattices of L(G), and show some new lower bounds.
“…In the present paper we deal only with finite group, even if there is a recent interest to the subject in the context of infinite groups [1,11,10,17,25]. The commutativity degree of a group G, given by (1.1)…”
The concept of subgroup commutativity degree of a finite group G is arising interest in several areas of group theory in the last years, since it gives a measure of the probability that a randomly picked pair (H, K) of subgroups of G satisfies the condition HK = KH. In this paper, a stronger notion is studied and relations with the commutativity degree are found.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.