2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-staging by magnetic resonance imaging for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Pattern of nodal involvement by radiological levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that, because of a rich lymphatic network in the nasopharynx, the incidence rate of cervical lymphatic metastasis in NPC patients is substantially high. The clinically evident cervical lymphadenopathy was reported to occur in more than 85 % of the patients with NPC (Ng et al, 2007;Tang et al, 2009), which was near the rate of approximately 86% in a total of 4,342 NPC patients admitted in our hospital from May 1989 to Oct. 2009. However, some patients with extensive primary tumors in the nasopharynx did not present detectable neck lymph adenopathy, representing a specific clinical pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is believed that, because of a rich lymphatic network in the nasopharynx, the incidence rate of cervical lymphatic metastasis in NPC patients is substantially high. The clinically evident cervical lymphadenopathy was reported to occur in more than 85 % of the patients with NPC (Ng et al, 2007;Tang et al, 2009), which was near the rate of approximately 86% in a total of 4,342 NPC patients admitted in our hospital from May 1989 to Oct. 2009. However, some patients with extensive primary tumors in the nasopharynx did not present detectable neck lymph adenopathy, representing a specific clinical pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Ng et al 21 defined SCF radiologically and replaced clinical SCF involvement with lower level involvement that includes Levels IV and Vb, which still is predictive for both distant control and overall survival. In the RTOG consensus, the SCF is not 1 of the neck levels specified in the LN-negative neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assignment of lymph node location was determined according to RTOG guidelines (8,14). The following 11 nodal groups were assessed: RP, level Ia, level Ib, level IIa, level IIb, level III, level IV, level V, level VI, SCF, and retrostyloid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, N staging by the 6th edition of the AJCC system for NPC does have limitations. First, the N staging criteria mainly depend on clinical examination, which is by no means perfect (8). For example, palpation-determined nodal size differs among clinicians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%