1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01408083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-shell ionization of tungsten by proton impact

Abstract: The cross section for tungsten N-shell ionization by proton impact has been measured between 0.015 and 2.8MeV. The measurements are compared with results from the semiclassical approach SCA), which has been extended to 4d ionization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They mentioned that their theoretical values are in good agreement with the experimental data. On the other hand, the RPWBA and the RPWBA-BC calculations of Chen and Crasemann [10] and all the present BEA models differ substantially from both experimental and theoretical values of Tittel and Bell [5] in low-energy and high-energy region. In order to see the reason for discrepancy between the SCA and their RPWBA values, Chen and Crasemann [10] performed the RPWBA calculations with the screened hydrogenic wave functions (RPWBA-SH).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They mentioned that their theoretical values are in good agreement with the experimental data. On the other hand, the RPWBA and the RPWBA-BC calculations of Chen and Crasemann [10] and all the present BEA models differ substantially from both experimental and theoretical values of Tittel and Bell [5] in low-energy and high-energy region. In order to see the reason for discrepancy between the SCA and their RPWBA values, Chen and Crasemann [10] performed the RPWBA calculations with the screened hydrogenic wave functions (RPWBA-SH).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…They mentioned that their theoretical values are in good agreement with the experimental data. On the other hand, the RPWBA and the RPWBA‐BC calculations of Chen and Crasemann and all the present BEA models differ substantially from both experimental and theoretical values of Tittel and Bell in low‐energy and high‐energy region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations