Unequivocally, Industrial Psychology as a relevant discipline or, more specifically, the application of the principles of human behaviour in the workplace has, and will continue to have, a central impact on the human condition. Principles arising from Industrial Psychology are interwoven in management practice. The terminology from the discipline is part and parcel of the South African manager's daily nomenclature. In South Africa thousands of university, technicon and college graduates take the principles they have learned in their studies of human resources management and apply them over time in organisations, either directly, or in terms of the outlook (or philosophy) which frames their approach to the working world.Understandably therefore, over time organisations have adapted to the needs of people so that productivity, quality of work life and self-actualization are promoted. Trends that demonstrate this include: flatter organisational structures, the devolution of power, fragmentation of organisations into smaller entities, shared ownership and the incentivisation for achievement.Moreover, evidence abounds that organisational effectiveness is promoted through the application of the principles of Industrial Psychology (see for example, Khumalo, 1999). In addition, it is unthinkable that we will succeed in a world economy built on intellectual capital (Handy, 1995;Bennis, 1998) and creativity (Coy, 2000) without the input of the discipline we call Industrial or Organisational Psychology. Without any doubt Industrial Psychology as a discipline plays an important role in the South African economy.
INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY AS AN IRRELEVANT PROFESSIONWhile the place of the discipline in enhancing the world of work is certain, the same cannot be said for Industrial Psychology as a profession in South Africa. If a profession is an occupation requiring specific, specialized education (Fowler & Fowler, 1966), then Industrial Psychology in South Africa is clearly not a profession. If the occupation of the Industrial Psychologist is applying the discipline as discussed earlier in this paper, then the vast majority of those practicing Industrial Psychology are not Industrial Psychologists, as only a very small percentage of those practicing Industrial Psychology are indeed registered as such (Renecle & Crafford, 1990). The difference between the Industrial Psychologist and the many others working in the field of people management and performance, is that the functioning of the former is regulated, whereas the latter are free from so-called professional regulation. This is particularly relevant in areas such as advertising and promotion.Furthermore, the profession as an umbrella is becoming increasingly irrelevant for practicing Industrial Psychologists. The profession, for example, remains regulated by the Health Professions Council of South Africa, whereas Industrial Psychology has as much to do with health professions as does auditing or street sweeping. Few practicing Industrial Psychologists are involved in the profe...