1986
DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v12i2.450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'n Oorsig van kritiek rondom bedryfsielkunde as suiwer en toegepaste wetenskap

Abstract: <p>A critical overview of Industrial Psychology. The aim of this article is to provide a critical overview of Industrial Psychology as a pure and applied science. With regard to theory there are clear indications that the field still lacks an integrated explanatory base. Methodological criticism indicates excessive concern with quantification and research methods. With regard to application it seems that despite attempts to humanize work industrial psychology has not yet had significant impact on organis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An inspection of past and present reviews of I/O psychology in South Africa confirms the above trend and shows: A preference for knowledge generation almost exclusively in the positivist-empiricist mode of Western science (Pietersen, 1985(Pietersen, , 1986b A lack of knowledge integration (Raubenheimer, 1978;Pietersen, 1986b;1989;Watkins, 2001) A lack of meta-scientific (philosophical) grounding (Veldsman, 1982(Veldsman, , 2001Pietersen, 1985Pietersen, , 1986bPietersen, , 1989 An excessive orientation toward the European and Western industrial/work population, and thus stopping short of a proper (second-stage) indigenisation of the discipline (Pietersen, 1986a;Moalusi, 2001) There is also the negative impact on research of the ongoing imbalance between I/O psychology as science (knowledge development endeavour) and as profession (knowledge application endeavour). Figure 3 indicates, for example that the vast majority of SAJIP research publications are predominantly generated (or at a minimum supervised and/or co-authored) by a relatively small group of white, male academics.…”
Section: Table 1 Comparison Of Sajip Research Trends (Percentages)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…An inspection of past and present reviews of I/O psychology in South Africa confirms the above trend and shows: A preference for knowledge generation almost exclusively in the positivist-empiricist mode of Western science (Pietersen, 1985(Pietersen, , 1986b A lack of knowledge integration (Raubenheimer, 1978;Pietersen, 1986b;1989;Watkins, 2001) A lack of meta-scientific (philosophical) grounding (Veldsman, 1982(Veldsman, , 2001Pietersen, 1985Pietersen, , 1986bPietersen, , 1989 An excessive orientation toward the European and Western industrial/work population, and thus stopping short of a proper (second-stage) indigenisation of the discipline (Pietersen, 1986a;Moalusi, 2001) There is also the negative impact on research of the ongoing imbalance between I/O psychology as science (knowledge development endeavour) and as profession (knowledge application endeavour). Figure 3 indicates, for example that the vast majority of SAJIP research publications are predominantly generated (or at a minimum supervised and/or co-authored) by a relatively small group of white, male academics.…”
Section: Table 1 Comparison Of Sajip Research Trends (Percentages)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…According to Pietersen (1986), industrial psychology is in a chaotic theoretical-conceptual 'state'. This may be a function of the fact that industrial psychology is still profoundly influenced by clinical, counselling and educational psychologists with their psychoanalytical, behaviourist and humanist ideas (Watkins, 2001).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%