The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

n-Kirchhoff–Choquard equations with exponential nonlinearity

Abstract: This article deals with the study of the following Kirchhoff equation with exponential nonlinearity of Choquard type (see (KC) below). We use the variational method in the light of Moser-Trudinger inequality to show the existence of weak solutions to (KC). Moreover, analyzing the fibering maps and minimizing the energy functional over suitable subsets of the Nehari manifold, we prove existence and multiplicity of weak solutions to convex-concave problem (P λ,M ) below.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now J λ,M (t 1 (u λ )u λ ) < J λ,M (u λ ) ≤ θ which yields a contradiction, since t 1 (u λ )u λ ∈ N λ,M . The proof for u λ being a local minimum for J λ,M in W m,2 0 (Ω) follows exactly as the proof of Theorem 4.12 in [5].…”
Section: Preliminary Results For Case-2mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now J λ,M (t 1 (u λ )u λ ) < J λ,M (u λ ) ≤ θ which yields a contradiction, since t 1 (u λ )u λ ∈ N λ,M . The proof for u λ being a local minimum for J λ,M in W m,2 0 (Ω) follows exactly as the proof of Theorem 4.12 in [5].…”
Section: Preliminary Results For Case-2mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…implies that v k ≤ C. Thus we get S(v k ) * ≤ C 1 and from (3.4) we have ξ − k (0) * ≤ C 2 . Now the rest of the proof follows as in the proof of Theorem 3.9 with the help of Lemma 3.7 (refer Theorem 4.13 of [5]).…”
Section: Energy Functional Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above Lemma follows from similar arguments as in Lemma 3.5 and Lemma 3.6 in [5]. Proof.…”
Section: And Ae In ωmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It shows that the presence of nonlinear coefficient m is meaningful to be considered. We cite [3,4,5,14] and there references within for further considerations.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation