2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.3044631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Element Biomimetic Antenna Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Re(Y 11 ), we neglect the cross-admittance being consistent with the admittance values and circuit simulation of [10]. Fig.…”
Section: A Array Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Re(Y 11 ), we neglect the cross-admittance being consistent with the admittance values and circuit simulation of [10]. Fig.…”
Section: A Array Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…1(a). The course of φ bio is significantly steeper around boresight (BS) (θ = 0 • ), indicating a much higher phase sensitivity, expressed by the angle-dependent phase gain (similar to [10])…”
Section: Bmaa Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such antenna arrays mimicking the hearing mechanism of the fly Ormia ochracea showed superior angle estimation behavior in various concepts [9], [10]. Advantages, among others, are a better angle estimation accuracy for arrays with fixed antenna spacing [11], [12], less required space for a predefined angular performance [13], or different possibilities to shape the BP of arrays [14], [15]. In contrast to the improvement of the angle estimation behavior through advanced signal processing, the processing time is not extended by BMAAs compared to conventional antennas using the same beamformer (usually a maximum likelihood estimator).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%