n-Alkyldimethylammonium propanesulfonates as stationary phase modifiers in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Tramposch, Walter G.; Weber, Stephen G.

doi:10.1021/ac00127a024

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With SDS in the mobile phase it is possible to induce the interaction of SDS with stationary phase and nanoparticles. The interaction between surfactant and stationary phase of chromatographic column was well documented. − The interaction between packing material and surfactant is the adsorption of surfactant on the surface of packing material. Hence, the separation performance is changed.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The interaction between surfactant and stationary phase of chromatographic column was well documented. [17][18][19][20] The interaction between packing material and surfactant is the adsorption of surfactant on the surface of packing material. Hence, the separation performance is changed.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is also possible that the interaction between nanoparticles and surfactant induces the alignment of surfactant around gold nanoparticles. The alignment of enough SDS molecules around gold nanoparticles, which are stabilized by cationic surfactants and behave like positively charged particles, 20 alternates the particles to be negatively charged. The possible interaction changes the surface of particles from positive to negative charge.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Shape Separation of Nanometer Gold Particles by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The shape separations of suspended gold nanoparticles were investigated using size-exclusion chromatography. The separations in shapes were identified by examining the 3-D chromatograms obtained by employing a diode-array detection system and were further confirmed by analyzing TEM images of fractional collection of particles. This shape separation was achieved by adding a mixed-surfactant system containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and poluoxyethylene (23) dodecanol (Brij-35) into the eluent, which apparently affects the adsorption behaviors of both rodlike and spherical Au nanoparticles onto the column packing materials. While the overall particle gross sizes of these two shapes were similar, the baseline resolution was unfortunately not obtainable. However, the absorption spectra from the diode-array detector could be utilized to interpret the shapes of Au nanoparticles. The potential capability for the size separation of Au nanoparticles by size-exclusion chromatography with diode-array detection was also demonstrated.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shape Separation of Nanometer Gold Particles by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zwitterionic surfactants have seen only limited use in analytical separations. In chromatography zwitterionic surfactants have been used as a stationary phase modifier, micellar mobile phase, and polar bonded stationary phase . In CZE, sub-cmc concentrations were used in conjunction with organic solvents to separate proteins and peptides on the basis of minor differences in their hydrophobic character.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suppression of Electroosmotic Flow and Prevention of Wall Adsorption in Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Using Zwitterionic Surfactants

1997

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Addition of zwitterionic surfactants such as dodecyldimethyl(3-sulfopropyl)ammonium hydroxide, hexadecyldimethyl(3-sulfopropyl)ammonium hydroxide, and coco (amidopropyl)hydroxyldimethylsulfobetaine (Rewoteric AM CAS U) to an electrophoretic buffer suppress the electroosmotic flow by 50-90%. Onset of suppression occurs at approximately the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant. CAS U effectively suppresses the electroosmotic flow over the pH range 3-12. Addition of 2 mM CAS U to the electrophoretic buffer prevents adsorption of cationic proteins lysozyme, α-chymotrypsinogen A, cytochrome c, and ribonuclease A. Migration time reproducibility for these proteins is ∼1% RSD within 1 day and 2-5% from day to day. Efficiencies in excess of 750 000 plates/m and recoveries of >80% were observed for protein injections from distilled water. Alternatively if 2 mM CAS U is added to samples, recoveries were quantitative, although efficiencies decreased to 325 000-600 000 plates/m. The natural electroosmotic flow of the capillaries is regenerated simply by rinsing with sodium hydroxide.

show abstract

“…To date, the vast majority of reports on CEC concern EOF with one direction, that is, cathodic or anodic EOF, for a CEC column; however, zwitterionic stationary phases, which can make it possible to generate EOF with different directions for one column, are seldom investigated in CEC. In fact, there are many reports concerning chromatographic separation with zwitterionically modified materials, although it is still one of the new liquid chromatography separation modes studied in recent years. − Hu et al established the zwitterionic functionality via dynamically adsorbing the ODS (octadecyl silica) column with a sulfobetaine-type zwitterionic surfactant by the interaction between the C 18 groups on the surface and the hydrophobic tail of the surfactant. To overcome the drawback of inferior stability due to loss of functional moieties from the dynamically attached layer on the surface of stationary phases, covalently bonded zwitterionic separation materials for liquid chromatography were prepared by direct surface reaction or surface graft polymerization. , Zwitterionic monoliths were also prepared by photoinitiated copolymerization of monomers with zwitterionic functional groups and methacrylic cross-linkers .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Monolithic Column with Zwitterionic Stationary Phase for Capillary Electrochromatography

Xie

Dong

et al. 2004

Anal. Chem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A capillary electrochromatography (CEC) monolithic column with zwitterionic stationary phases was prepared by in situ polymerization of butyl methacrylate, ethylene dimethacrylate, methacrylic acid, and 2-(dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate in the presence of porogens. The stationary phases have zwitterionic functional groups, that is, both tertiary amine and acrylic acid groups, so the ionization of those groups on the zwitterionic stationary phase was affected by the pH values of the mobile phase, and further affects the strength and direction of the electroosmotic flow (EOF). Separations of alkylbenzenes and polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons based on the hydrophobic mechanism were obtained. Separation of various types of polar compounds, including phenols, anilines, and peptides, on the prepared column were performed under CEC mode with anodic and cathodic EOF, and different separation selectivities of those polar analytes were observed on the monolithic capillary column by using mobile phases with different pH values.Ionizable groups on the surface of the stationary phase are necessary to generate substantial electoosmotic flow (EOF) for capillary electrochromatography (CEC). 1 Strictly speaking, most stationary phases used in CEC are ion-exchangers. Silica-based packing materials, which have been most widely used in CEC and can be regarded as weak cation exchangers, generate cathodic EOF due to the ionization of the residual silanol groups on the surface of packings. Recently, strong ion exchangers and so-called mixed-mode packing materials consisting of ionic groups such as sulfonic acids or quaternary amines and hydrocarbon chains have attracted much attention in CEC, because these packings ensure stable EOF over an extended pH range. 2 The direction of the EOF depends on the charges on the surface of the stationary phases, so stationary phases with positively charged functional groups, such as amino groups or ammonium groups, generate an EOF from cathode to anode, whereas stationary phases carrying negatively charged groups, such as sulfonic acid and carboxylic acid, generate cathodic EOF. To date, the vast majority of reports on CEC concern EOF with one direction, that is, cathodic or anodic EOF, for a CEC column; however, zwitterionic stationary phases, which can make it possible to generate EOF with different directions for one column, are seldom investigated in CEC. In fact, there are many reports concerning chromatographic separation with zwitterionically modified materials, although it is still one of the new liquid chromatography separation modes studied in recent years. [3][4][5][6] Hu et al. 7 established the zwitterionic functionality via dynamically adsorbing the ODS (octadecyl silica) column with a sulfobetaine-type zwitterionic surfactant by the interaction between the C 18 groups on the surface and the hydrophobic tail of the surfactant. To overcome the drawback of inferior stability due to loss of functional moieties from the dynamically attached layer on the surface of stationary phases, ...

show abstract

n-Alkyldimethylammonium propanesulfonates as stationary phase modifiers in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Cited by 7 publications

References 42 publications

Shape Separation of Nanometer Gold Particles by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Shape Separation of Nanometer Gold Particles by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Suppression of Electroosmotic Flow and Prevention of Wall Adsorption in Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Using Zwitterionic Surfactants

Monolithic Column with Zwitterionic Stationary Phase for Capillary Electrochromatography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About