“…Il fatto che il rischio di nefropatia da MdC può essere più alto in caso the procedure [18]. The usefulness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy [19] is still being debated in the literature; however, until conclusive evidence becomes available, we believe it reasonable to continue its use, as it is inexpensive, simple to administer and free of side effects. If necessary, the nephrologist requests serum creatinine testing after the examination (at 12, 24, 36 or 48 di somministrazione intra-arteriosa del mezzo di contrasto [15] [18].…”
Section: In Media Il 20% Dei Pazienti Prenotati Per Un Esame Con MDC mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, the nephrologist requests serum creatinine testing after the examination (at 12, 24, 36 or 48 di somministrazione intra-arteriosa del mezzo di contrasto [15] [18]. In letteratura l'utilità dell'acetilcisteina per la prevenzione della nefropatia da MdC è assai controverso [19] h); a 25% increase in serum creatinine within 3 days after contrast administration is considered to be contrast-induced nephropathy [20]. In addition, to prevent possible lactic acidosis [21], diabetic patients receiving metformin are instructed to discontinue the medication 48 h before and not resume it until 48 h after the examination, after renal function has been evaluated.…”
Section: In Media Il 20% Dei Pazienti Prenotati Per Un Esame Con MDC mentioning
Purpose. The aim of this paper is to report on the implementation of new guidelines on the use of injectable iodinated contrast media (ICM) at our workplace and specific protocols for the preparation of patients at risk. Materials and methods. Operators received training with continuing medical education (CME) credits. The new documentation (patient history/screening form and informed consent form) is available on the hospital Web site and requests serum creatinine determination with estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for every patient. Additional tests are required for high-risk patients only. Results. Attendance rates were 57.2% among referring physicians and 74.5% among Radiology Department personnel. The Cockcroft-Gault formula was used to estimate GFR in adults. The main problem encountered in the implementation process was that referring physicians failed to evaluate the GFR in 80% of patients, with low GFR being discovered in the Radiology Department on the day of examination in 20% of patients, resulting in a need to reschedule the examination. Conclusions. Although not an easy task, implementation of the new guidelines for ICM use is both feasible and necessary. An additional refresher training course for personnel and GFR evaluation of the patient on referral are indispensable to ensure proper preparation of patients at increased risk of adverse reactions to ICM.
Riassunto
“…Il fatto che il rischio di nefropatia da MdC può essere più alto in caso the procedure [18]. The usefulness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy [19] is still being debated in the literature; however, until conclusive evidence becomes available, we believe it reasonable to continue its use, as it is inexpensive, simple to administer and free of side effects. If necessary, the nephrologist requests serum creatinine testing after the examination (at 12, 24, 36 or 48 di somministrazione intra-arteriosa del mezzo di contrasto [15] [18].…”
Section: In Media Il 20% Dei Pazienti Prenotati Per Un Esame Con MDC mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, the nephrologist requests serum creatinine testing after the examination (at 12, 24, 36 or 48 di somministrazione intra-arteriosa del mezzo di contrasto [15] [18]. In letteratura l'utilità dell'acetilcisteina per la prevenzione della nefropatia da MdC è assai controverso [19] h); a 25% increase in serum creatinine within 3 days after contrast administration is considered to be contrast-induced nephropathy [20]. In addition, to prevent possible lactic acidosis [21], diabetic patients receiving metformin are instructed to discontinue the medication 48 h before and not resume it until 48 h after the examination, after renal function has been evaluated.…”
Section: In Media Il 20% Dei Pazienti Prenotati Per Un Esame Con MDC mentioning
Purpose. The aim of this paper is to report on the implementation of new guidelines on the use of injectable iodinated contrast media (ICM) at our workplace and specific protocols for the preparation of patients at risk. Materials and methods. Operators received training with continuing medical education (CME) credits. The new documentation (patient history/screening form and informed consent form) is available on the hospital Web site and requests serum creatinine determination with estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for every patient. Additional tests are required for high-risk patients only. Results. Attendance rates were 57.2% among referring physicians and 74.5% among Radiology Department personnel. The Cockcroft-Gault formula was used to estimate GFR in adults. The main problem encountered in the implementation process was that referring physicians failed to evaluate the GFR in 80% of patients, with low GFR being discovered in the Radiology Department on the day of examination in 20% of patients, resulting in a need to reschedule the examination. Conclusions. Although not an easy task, implementation of the new guidelines for ICM use is both feasible and necessary. An additional refresher training course for personnel and GFR evaluation of the patient on referral are indispensable to ensure proper preparation of patients at increased risk of adverse reactions to ICM.
Riassunto
“…Intravenous hydration with 0.9% SS) 0.9% SS 1 mL/kg/h, 12 hours before and 12 hours after the procedure Several randomized studies and metaanalyses 30,[32][33][34] 0.9% SS is superior to 0.45% SS 23,32 Sodium bicarbonate (154 mEq/L) NaHCO3 3 mL/kg/h, 1 hour before the procedure and 1 mL/kg/h, 6 hours after the procedure Several randomized studies and meta-analyses 32,[49][50][51][52][53][54] Dilute 154 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate in 846 mL of distilled water for obtaining the solution Type of contrast medium Low-osmolality or iso-osmolality contrast medium Some randomized studies and a few meta-analyses [26][27][28] The literature is still controversial whether isoosmolality contrast medium is superior to low-osmolality contrast medium 29 N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg, orally, 12/12 hours, 24 hours before and after the procedure Still controversial 54,55 Large ongoing multicenter study 56 …”
Section: Most Used Methods Evidence Level Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Other meta-analyses studying N-acetyl cysteine provided conflicting results, making the real efficacy of using that drug for preventing CN questionable. 54,55 It is worth noting the existence of an ongoing Brazilian randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (2,300 patients) using either N-acetyl cysteine, 600 mg, orally, every 12 hours (two doses before and two doses after the contrast-enhanced procedure) or placebo, in patients undergoing angiography. The initial endpoint is the occurrence of CN, defined as a 25% increase in baseline creatinine, within 48 to 96 hours after the exam.…”
“…Because animal studies have indicated that NAC may protect the myocardium and preserve kidney function [128], it was expected to prevent CIN in humans. After the report by Tepel et al [65] on the effect of NAC (600 mg twice daily, orally) in preventing CIN, many RCTs and meta-analyses were conducted [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139].…”
Section: Level Of Evidence: II Grade Of Recommendation: C2 Rationale mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.