49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-3654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N+3 and N+4 Generation Aeropropulsion Engine Combustors: Part 6: Operating Conditions, Target Goals and Lifted Jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mainstream 3D strong rotational flow field test method employs particle imaging velocimeter (PIV) to examine the flow field structure. This method can measure 2D planar flow field based on true condition in the combustor, thereby obtaining the entire flow field structure in the combustor [11][12][13][14]. Accordingly, numerical simulation results can be validated by the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mainstream 3D strong rotational flow field test method employs particle imaging velocimeter (PIV) to examine the flow field structure. This method can measure 2D planar flow field based on true condition in the combustor, thereby obtaining the entire flow field structure in the combustor [11][12][13][14]. Accordingly, numerical simulation results can be validated by the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mainstream 3D strong rotational flow field test method employs particle imaging velocimeter (PIV) to examine the flow field structure. This method can measure 2D planar flow field based on true condition in the combustor, thereby obtaining the entire flow field structure in the combustor [11][12][13][14]. Accordingly, numerical simulation results can be validated by the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%