1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02860855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myxomycete biosystematics: Some recent developments and future research opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All reported attempts to make hyperamoebae strains fruit have failed, although amoebae were transferred from liquid cultures to agar plates (Dyková et al 2007;Karpov and Mylnikov 1997;Michel et al 2003). However, fruiting is a sexual process that involves fusion of two haploid, sexually compatible and thus, genetically diverse, amoeboflagellates in a diploid zygote which, under appropriate conditions, can differentiate into fruiting bodies (Collins 1979). Many myxogastrid strains are heterothallic, and cannot form fruiting bodies in clonal cultures because of the absence of the compatible mating type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All reported attempts to make hyperamoebae strains fruit have failed, although amoebae were transferred from liquid cultures to agar plates (Dyková et al 2007;Karpov and Mylnikov 1997;Michel et al 2003). However, fruiting is a sexual process that involves fusion of two haploid, sexually compatible and thus, genetically diverse, amoeboflagellates in a diploid zygote which, under appropriate conditions, can differentiate into fruiting bodies (Collins 1979). Many myxogastrid strains are heterothallic, and cannot form fruiting bodies in clonal cultures because of the absence of the compatible mating type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only, a minority of myxomycetes can be induced to fruit in culture. However, experiments with cultivable species, mostly Physarales, revealed groups of compatible strains (Collins, ) or so‐called biospecies. Empirical evidence of whether all morphospecies reflect true biospecies is lacking (reviewed in Clark & Haskins, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lower surface of the plasmodium, while Liceida, Tri chiida, Echinostelida, and Physarida were subhypo thallic. Collins [7] based the characteristic of plasmo dia suggested the Physarida was the most primitive, possessing phaneroplasmodia, it was further divided into Echinostelida which has a protoplasmodium, Stemonitida with a phaneroplasmodium, Liceida with a protoplasmodium or phaneroplasmodium, and finally Trichiida, which has an intermediate between a aphaneroplasmodium and phaneroplasmodium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%