2022
DOI: 10.1177/08862605211023487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myths Concerning Sexual Violence Toward Women in Poland, Hungary, and Norway in the Context of System Justification Theory: The Role of Beliefs in the Biological Origins of Gender Differences and Ambivalent Sexism

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare attitudes toward rape in Poland, Hungary, and Norway. Based on system justification theory, we examined whether country of origin predicts levels of rape myth acceptance, beliefs in the biological origins of gender differences, and ambivalent sexism. There is also some evidence that beliefs in the biological origins of gender differences predict rape myth among Polish students and that this relationship is mediated by hostile sexism. The current study aimed to test whet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may suggest that interactions outside the home environment are less important to the incidence of violent behavior against women. This may be directly related to the patriarchal paradigm still prevalent in Polish families and, unfortunately, the quite common occurrence of violence against women [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may suggest that interactions outside the home environment are less important to the incidence of violent behavior against women. This may be directly related to the patriarchal paradigm still prevalent in Polish families and, unfortunately, the quite common occurrence of violence against women [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both men and women who endorse essentialist thinking and biological attributions for gender differences also endorse statements that justify and reinforce existing gender hierarchies that put women at a disadvantage when social change threatens the current advantages of the dominant group (typically men; Brescoll et al., 2013; Kray et al., 2017; Morton et al., 2009). The belief in the biological component of gender essentialism is also associated with higher acceptance of rape myths or misconceptions concerning rape, its perpetrators, and survivors (Łyś et al., 2022).…”
Section: Part I: Essentialism and Promoting Fairness In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%