Myths and Misconceptions About Nonnative English Speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) Movement

Abstract

Parallel to the growing recognition of English as an international language, the fundamental premises of the TESOL discipline (e.g., the ownership of the language, native speakers as a goal and model of competence for learning and teaching, linguistic standards and language variety/ies to be taught, monolingual/monocultural approach to teaching) has undergone a serious challenge and reconceptualization over the past several decades. While this trend resulted in an unprecedented recognition of the issues surrounding nonnative speakers in the field of TESOL, it also meant the emergence of a series of unfounded ideas or false beliefs about nonnative English speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) movement. By discussing and problematizing these commonly held myths and misconceptions about the NNEST movement, the current article aims to clarify a number of important issues and shed a light onto the past, present, and future of the movement. Having a solid grasp of the movement in the context of global dynamics, changing times, and reconfigured fundamental premises of the discipline has a paramount importance for all stakeholders involved in TESOL who long for a professional milieu characterized by democracy, justice, equity, participation, and professionalism. doi: 10.1002/tesj.158He drew a circle that shut me outHeretic, rebel, a thing to flout. But love and I had the wit to win: We drew a circle and took him in! -From the poem "Outwitted" by Edwin Markham

The Effect of Perception of Teacher Characteristics on Spanish EFL Learners’ Anxiety and Enjoyment

“…However, it is important to note that students’ preference and attitude toward teachers could be a multifaceted phenomenon, as it can be affected by a range of factors especially related to teachers’ level of professionalism despite their L1 background and physical appearance (Selvi, ). For example, Moussu's () study revealed that students’ impressions of their LX user EFL teachers became more positive over the semester.…”

The Decolonial Option in English Teaching: Can the Subaltern Act?

“…Two years later, in 2008, the organization upgraded the NNEST Caucus to an Interest Section, thus giving it improved status and enhanced visibility. (See Selvi, , for a detailed essay on the NNEST movement. )…”

Rethinking Nativeness: Toward a Dynamic Paradigm of (Non)Native Speakering

“…Together, these three points reinforce the notion evident from moments 1 and 2 that people from a given nation are expected to look, speak, and act in certain ways similar to one another and emblematic of that nation, and that those who deviate from these expectations are somehow inferior or illegitimate. Finally, unearthing the historical roots of such mechanisms of (non) native speakering sheds light on why asserting the "privilege" of nonnative speakers" (Medgyes, 1992;Selvi, 2014) in some ways undermines the very equity it attempts to advance-such an effort it itself constructs a nonnative speakered subject, which is inherently inferior to its simultaneously produced native speakered counterpart.…”

“…The movement has explored the impact of these native speaker ideologies on the lived experiences and identity development of NNESTs around the world (e.g., Amin, 1997;Brutt-Griffler & Samimy, 2001;Reves & Medgyes, 1994;Park, 2012;Rudolph, 2012;Tang, 1997). From this perspective, foundational concepts in language acquisition such as fossilization (Selinker, 1972), ideal language input (Long, 1981), and target language norms (Ellis, 1994), that form the "bedrock of transnationalized ELT" (Leung, 2005, p. 128) not only perpetuate the notion of the existence of an "idealized native speaker-listener" (Chomsky, 1965, p. 3) and "ideal" or "target" language features but also risk obscuring the dynamic nature of language development, assume languages and native speakers are internally homogeneous, and marginalize those who speak lessprivileged language varieties (Selvi, 2014).…”