2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1091533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myth and Reality of Flat Tax Reform: Micro Estimates of Tax Evasion Response and Welfare Effects in Russia

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, car values grew by only 37 percent in the private sector and by 24.3 percent in the stateowned sector. These values suggest that increased transparency might indeed be responsible for a large share of growth in statistically measured GDP (compare Gorodnichenko, Martinez-Vazquez, and Peter 2009). And the increase in transparency seems to have been more pronounced in the state-owned than in the private sector.…”
Section: Implications For Official Statistics Of Gross Domestic Productmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, car values grew by only 37 percent in the private sector and by 24.3 percent in the stateowned sector. These values suggest that increased transparency might indeed be responsible for a large share of growth in statistically measured GDP (compare Gorodnichenko, Martinez-Vazquez, and Peter 2009). And the increase in transparency seems to have been more pronounced in the state-owned than in the private sector.…”
Section: Implications For Official Statistics Of Gross Domestic Productmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous empirical approaches exploit macroeconomic relationships, such as the share of cash in the money supply (Cagan 1958;Tanzi 1983), electricity consumption (Kaufmann and Kaliberda 1996;Schneider and Enste 2000;Alexeev and Pyle 2003), or multiple indicators aimed at econometrically estimating the hidden activity as an unobserved variable (Frey and Weck-Hanneman 1984;Giles 1999). Other studies use survey data on household incomes and consumption expenditures (Pissarides and Weber 1989;Lyssiotou, Pashardes, and Stengos 2004;Ivanova, Keen, and Klemm 2005;Gorodnichenko, Martinez-Vazquez, and Peter 2009). Yet other studies employ direct evidence from tax audits (Klepper and Nagin 1989;Feinstein 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, tax compliance and revenue apparently improved by about one third after the 2001 tax reform (Ivanova et al 2005). However, it is not clear whether this can be attributed solely to the flat tax or to improved law enforcement and tax administration which was also part of the 2001 reform (see also Gaddy andGale 2005 andGorodnichenko et al 2007). Moreover, the case of Russia differs from Germany insofar as the latter has a long tradition of income taxation in a market economy and a well-established tax administration to ensure tax compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gorodnichenko, Martinez‐Vazquez, and Peter () report evidence from Russian survey data suggesting that people under‐report income to survey takers for fear of tipping off the tax authorities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%