2020
DOI: 10.58193/ilu.1666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mystical-Type Experience at The Virtual Reality Interface. Technics, Aesthetics, and Theology in the Search for Cosmic Connection

Abstract: In recently received event invitations and articles in online tech publications such as Wired, Futurism and Th e Verge, 1) I have noticed an interesting pattern of a kind of "spiritual" attention being paid towards new digital immersive technologies like Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). I attended one such event (in which an acquaintance, a "ritual designer", was involved) and my experience there deepened my interest in this fi eld of what I would call quasi-religious, mystical or metaphysical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, these subjective states exhibit high conceptual overlap with Stace’s (1960) and James’ (1902) definitions of the mystical experience as involving nonduality (oneness), a transcendence of normal space–time (presence), a sense that the encounter is spiritually significant (reverence) and has a “noetic quality” (insight), and engenders both high (rapture) and lower arousal (love) positive emotions. Coupled to the phenomenological responses that were rated highest for VR-P, which included awe, beauty, mindful observing, novelty, interest, contentment, and joy (Figure 6) as well as presence, vividness, and absorption (Figure 4), the current empirical results also appear to support the philosophical and media research framework of Strutt (2020) who emphasized that technological (e.g., immersive, interactive), metaphysical (e.g., transcendence), esthetic (e.g., awe, beauty), and theological (e.g., reverence) elements may combine and interact to bring about mystical experiences in VR-P. It should be noted that comparison between the correlations observed with VR-P versus EC-I was rendered difficult in the current research, however, in considering the mean differences observed between the two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Indeed, these subjective states exhibit high conceptual overlap with Stace’s (1960) and James’ (1902) definitions of the mystical experience as involving nonduality (oneness), a transcendence of normal space–time (presence), a sense that the encounter is spiritually significant (reverence) and has a “noetic quality” (insight), and engenders both high (rapture) and lower arousal (love) positive emotions. Coupled to the phenomenological responses that were rated highest for VR-P, which included awe, beauty, mindful observing, novelty, interest, contentment, and joy (Figure 6) as well as presence, vividness, and absorption (Figure 4), the current empirical results also appear to support the philosophical and media research framework of Strutt (2020) who emphasized that technological (e.g., immersive, interactive), metaphysical (e.g., transcendence), esthetic (e.g., awe, beauty), and theological (e.g., reverence) elements may combine and interact to bring about mystical experiences in VR-P. It should be noted that comparison between the correlations observed with VR-P versus EC-I was rendered difficult in the current research, however, in considering the mean differences observed between the two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%