“…Indeed, these subjective states exhibit high conceptual overlap with Stace’s (1960) and James’ (1902) definitions of the mystical experience as involving nonduality (oneness), a transcendence of normal space–time (presence), a sense that the encounter is spiritually significant (reverence) and has a “noetic quality” (insight), and engenders both high (rapture) and lower arousal (love) positive emotions. Coupled to the phenomenological responses that were rated highest for VR-P, which included awe, beauty, mindful observing, novelty, interest, contentment, and joy (Figure 6) as well as presence, vividness, and absorption (Figure 4), the current empirical results also appear to support the philosophical and media research framework of Strutt (2020) who emphasized that technological (e.g., immersive, interactive), metaphysical (e.g., transcendence), esthetic (e.g., awe, beauty), and theological (e.g., reverence) elements may combine and interact to bring about mystical experiences in VR-P. It should be noted that comparison between the correlations observed with VR-P versus EC-I was rendered difficult in the current research, however, in considering the mean differences observed between the two conditions.…”