2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98449-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mysterious Minke Whales: Acoustic Diversity and Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we note that this would be phylogenetically and evolutionarily incongruent, since the fundamental characteristics of song structure (in terms of frequency band, unit and phrase structure and timing/rhythm of song components) tend to be conserved among populations of the same species, such that their songs are generally recognizable as that species despite geographical variation among the populations. This consistency in song structure has been well demonstrated for humpback whales [38,59], blue whales [25], minke whales [39] and Omura's whales [27,60]. The MF song that we describe is so acoustically divergent from the LF vocalizations reported in other populations, that it is difficult to imagine a selective scenario in which populations of the same species could evolve such divergent reproductive displays.…”
Section: Mid-frequency Songsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we note that this would be phylogenetically and evolutionarily incongruent, since the fundamental characteristics of song structure (in terms of frequency band, unit and phrase structure and timing/rhythm of song components) tend to be conserved among populations of the same species, such that their songs are generally recognizable as that species despite geographical variation among the populations. This consistency in song structure has been well demonstrated for humpback whales [38,59], blue whales [25], minke whales [39] and Omura's whales [27,60]. The MF song that we describe is so acoustically divergent from the LF vocalizations reported in other populations, that it is difficult to imagine a selective scenario in which populations of the same species could evolve such divergent reproductive displays.…”
Section: Mid-frequency Songsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Song has been documented among most of the Balaenopteridae, and is suspected to be a common male reproductive display. Singing behaviour has been best described for humpback whales (reviewed in [38]), but most species of Balaenoptera produce rhythmically repetitive vocalizations that have formally been recognized as songs, including blue whales [25], fin whales [23,24], Antarctic minke whales (B. bonaerensis, [39]), common and dwarf minke whales (B. acutorostrata, [40][41][42]), and Omura's whales (B. omurai, [26,27]). Bryde's whales (B. edeni) and Rice's whale (B. ricei) have also been reported to make stereotyped 'calls ' [sic] that have rhythmic repetition rates [43][44][45][46]; the descriptions of these vocalizations are consistent with a reproductive song display, although they are not formally referred to as song in their respective literature.…”
Section: Mid-frequency Songmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How this is accomplished is not clear, but apparently it involves mutual melding or adoption, which are forms of cultural transmission (Noad 2011;Darling et al 2019). Similar mechanisms of vocal learning may occur in blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) (McDonald et al 2006;Archer et al 2020), in which males typically sing the same song within a region, and in other baleen whale species that sing (Cerchio 2022;Risch 2022), although there is variation in the degree of social conformity and individual innovation among species (Stafford 2022). The importance of social learning is also evident in the evolution of post-reproductive lifespans in killer Fig.…”
Section: The Social Context Of Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%