2020
DOI: 10.3390/nu12082401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myostatin as a Biomarker of Muscle Wasting and other Pathologies-State of the Art and Knowledge Gaps

Abstract: Sarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome with a significant impact on older patients’ quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Despite the new available criteria, its early diagnosis remains difficult, highlighting the necessity of looking for a valid muscle wasting biomarker. Myostatin, a muscle mass negative regulator, is one of the potential candidates. The aim of this work is to point out various factors affecting the potential of myostatin as a biomarker of muscle wasting. Based on the literature review, we ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
4
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We know of the existence of biomarkers that could potentially influence the diagnosis and development of sarcopenic disease and SO. However, due to the physiological complexity of these pathologies, it is unlikely that there is a single specific biomarker [ 6 , 7 ] that allows the identification of these diseases in the different vital stages. From this point of view, the study and development of a panel of biomarkers that can harbor direct or indirect relationships in the diagnosis and treatment of said diseases becomes relevant, and these should be easily obtained and interpreted in the clinical context as well as economically viable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know of the existence of biomarkers that could potentially influence the diagnosis and development of sarcopenic disease and SO. However, due to the physiological complexity of these pathologies, it is unlikely that there is a single specific biomarker [ 6 , 7 ] that allows the identification of these diseases in the different vital stages. From this point of view, the study and development of a panel of biomarkers that can harbor direct or indirect relationships in the diagnosis and treatment of said diseases becomes relevant, and these should be easily obtained and interpreted in the clinical context as well as economically viable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, it is considered a good candidate for inclusion in the panel of muscle-wasting biomarkers. However, the use of myostatin for the diagnosis and prognosis of cachexia is affected by several issues: in particular, contradictory results regarding the correlation of its high serum levels and muscle wasting were reported in sarcopenic patients due to age and gender differences [ 67 ], while decreased serum levels of myostatin were found in patients with lung, colorectal, and medullary thyroid cancer [ 68 , 69 ]. Physical activity [ 70 ] and nutritional status [ 71 ] are also confounding factors for the adoption of myostatin as a biomarker of cachexia [ 67 ].…”
Section: Markers Of Cachexia Used In the Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of myostatin for the diagnosis and prognosis of cachexia is affected by several issues: in particular, contradictory results regarding the correlation of its high serum levels and muscle wasting were reported in sarcopenic patients due to age and gender differences [ 67 ], while decreased serum levels of myostatin were found in patients with lung, colorectal, and medullary thyroid cancer [ 68 , 69 ]. Physical activity [ 70 ] and nutritional status [ 71 ] are also confounding factors for the adoption of myostatin as a biomarker of cachexia [ 67 ]. Activin is another member of the TGF-β superfamily: elevated levels of plasma activin have been proposed as an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients [ 72 ], and its causative role in mediating catabolic responses and atrophy in muscle cells has been recently demonstrated in vitro [ 52 ].…”
Section: Markers Of Cachexia Used In the Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations