2019 American Control Conference (ACC) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2019.8814482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myopic Control of Systems with Unknown Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that dynamics given by (10) still evolve on X . Because of the time-varying element of N , (10) does not automatically fall within the class of systems in (1). However, by appending an additional variable x n+1 given by the dynamics dx n+1 /dt = 1 and x n+1 (0) = 0, and with an obvious slight abuse of notation, we obtain dynamicṡ…”
Section: Robustness To Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assume that dynamics given by (10) still evolve on X . Because of the time-varying element of N , (10) does not automatically fall within the class of systems in (1). However, by appending an additional variable x n+1 given by the dynamics dx n+1 /dt = 1 and x n+1 (0) = 0, and with an obvious slight abuse of notation, we obtain dynamicṡ…”
Section: Robustness To Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All values are in feet, seconds and centiradians. The limits on control inputs are set to u 1 = δ e ∈ [− 30,30] and 1], roughly informed by the descriptions in [41], [42].…”
Section: A Damaged Aircraft Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assumptions and objectives of this work come from the context of online learning and control of a nonlinear system with unknown dynamics. Such a framework, described by Ornik et al [2017Ornik et al [ , 2019, is motivated by the desire to successfully control a system with entirely unknown dynamics by learning as much as possible about the dynamics "on the fly", i.e., solely from the system's behavior during a single system run; it differs from classical work on adaptive or robust control [Ioannou andSun, 1996, Dullerud andPaganini, 2000] by not assuming almost any knowledge about the magnitude or the structure of uncertainty about the system dynamics, and from work on datadriven learning and control synthesis by not allowing collection of information on system dynamics by way of repeated system runs [Brunton et al, 2016, Chen et al, 2018.…”
Section: Motivation and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous work has considered computation of reachable sets under uncertainties in dynamics such as those given by bounded unknown disturbances [Mitchell et al, 2005] or a finite number of uncertain parameters [Althoff et al, 2008], the framework that we are considering contains substantially fewer information. Namely, motivated by the work of Ornik et al [2017Ornik et al [ , 2019 that determines local controlled dynamics of a nonlinear system at a given state using solely the information from a single trajectory until the time that the system reached that state, we assume that the only available knowledge at the time of computing the reachable set consists of (i) local dynamics at a single point and (ii) Lipschitz bounds on the rate of change of system dynamics in the state space. As we do not know anything else about the system dynamics, we wish to determine the set of states that are guaranteed to be reachable from that single point regardless of the true system dynamics, as long as they are consistent with the above knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%