2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myogenic Potential of Canine Craniofacial Satellite Cells

Abstract: The skeletal fibers have different embryological origin; the extraocular and jaw-closer muscles develop from prechordal mesoderm while the limb and trunk muscles from somites. These different origins characterize also the adult muscle stem cells, known as satellite cells (SCs) and responsible for the fiber growth and regeneration. The physiological properties of presomitic SCs and their epigenetics are poorly studied despite their peculiar characteristics to preserve muscle integrity during chronic muscle dege… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The normal expression of Pax7 in isolated miR-206/133b mutant satellite cells and the normal differentiation of mutant satellite cells to myotubes in vitro do not argue for an important role of miR-206 in Pax7 expression. These results are in contrast to previous publications mostly relying on the inhibition of miR-206 by anti-miRs [ 16 ], overexpression of miR-206 [ 15 , 36 ], or by correlation of expression profiles [ 37 , 38 ]. It seems possible that previous anti-miR approaches were biased by off-target effects or affected expression of miR-1, which can also suppress Pax7.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The normal expression of Pax7 in isolated miR-206/133b mutant satellite cells and the normal differentiation of mutant satellite cells to myotubes in vitro do not argue for an important role of miR-206 in Pax7 expression. These results are in contrast to previous publications mostly relying on the inhibition of miR-206 by anti-miRs [ 16 ], overexpression of miR-206 [ 15 , 36 ], or by correlation of expression profiles [ 37 , 38 ]. It seems possible that previous anti-miR approaches were biased by off-target effects or affected expression of miR-1, which can also suppress Pax7.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…On the contrary, McCarthy et al ( 2007 ) proposed that increased miR-206 expression may contribute to the chronic pathology of mdx diaphragm. In addition, miR-206 seems to be primarily involved in satellite cell impairment of dystrophic dogs, although its precise role needs to be elucidated (La Rovere et al, 2014 ). The apparent discrepancy among these studies and our findings can be justified considering that the up-regulation of miR-206 in the diaphragm of mdx/mIGF-1 might be related to its specific function in muscle differentiation instead in muscle pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, canine craniofacial muscle satellite cells exhibited more efficient and faster differentiation and a stronger stem cell phenotype compared to somite-derived satellite cells (La Rovere et al, 2014). In contrast, satellite cells derived from mouse masseter muscle were able to regenerate muscle in a trunk muscle injury model as well as trunk-derived satellite cells (Harel et al, 2009;Ono et al, 2010).…”
Section: Head Muscle Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 97%