2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myoelectric pattern recognition of hand motions for stroke rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This classification method shows higher performance than other classification methods, such as support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis, in the previous study. 40 In this study, the recognition accuracy of this method reaches an 86.25% correct classification rate. Different from the recognition of actions in the previous study, it is found through the assessment experiment that the classification accuracy presents a specific difference under training loads, and this may cause a decrease in the accuracy of dynamic recognition (about 6%) in the evaluation stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This classification method shows higher performance than other classification methods, such as support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis, in the previous study. 40 In this study, the recognition accuracy of this method reaches an 86.25% correct classification rate. Different from the recognition of actions in the previous study, it is found through the assessment experiment that the classification accuracy presents a specific difference under training loads, and this may cause a decrease in the accuracy of dynamic recognition (about 6%) in the evaluation stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Many robotics-based systems provide bilateral grasp rehabilitation, which use muscle EMG of the unaffected hand and forearm for classification and trigger the execution to drive the affected limbs of the patients for rehabilitation training [33], [34]. Other studies have focused on intention detection based on the EMG signals from the affected side of stroke patients [35]- [37]. However, the sEMGbased classification results of movement intentions of stroke survivors are less accurate than those of healthy people due to neural damage.…”
Section: A Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forearm sEMG-based intention detection has also been employed to control assistive exoskeletons or hand prostheses [43]. Most of the movements were selected from clinical-based assessment scales, and are highly related to ADLs, including wrist flexion, wrist extension, mass flexion, mass extension, hook-like grasp, opposition (hand pinch) and thumb adduction (lateral hand pinch), cylinder grip, and spherical grip [35]- [37], [44].…”
Section: B Prosthesis Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], we conducted significant studies to characterize muscle effort by extracting relevant features from the patient’s EMG signals and training machine learning models to identify hand motions according to standard clinical exercises applied for hand rehabilitation. Here, our contribution is twofold: (i) a combined model based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) and fuzzy logic was implemented to determine specific levels of actuation velocities for the exoskeleton, by identifying muscle effort from the EMG signals; (ii) an adaptive control scheme for the exoskeleton with feedback from the ANN-fuzzy model to actively counterbalance muscle effort in real-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%