1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90091-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Benefits of coronary revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other investigators [13] have shown that the presence of angina had no statistically significant predictive value with regard to long-term mortality and the recurrence of heart failure. Dreyfus and colleagues [22] emphasized the importance of using viability tests instead of clinical evaluation as a crucial determinant of patient selection and subsequent postoperative outcome. In our series, hibernating myocardium was a statistically significant predictor of immediate postoperative recovery, but the preoperative ischemia class and NYHA functional class were statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome.…”
Section: Predictors Of Late Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other investigators [13] have shown that the presence of angina had no statistically significant predictive value with regard to long-term mortality and the recurrence of heart failure. Dreyfus and colleagues [22] emphasized the importance of using viability tests instead of clinical evaluation as a crucial determinant of patient selection and subsequent postoperative outcome. In our series, hibernating myocardium was a statistically significant predictor of immediate postoperative recovery, but the preoperative ischemia class and NYHA functional class were statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome.…”
Section: Predictors Of Late Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies involving small numbers of patients and considering different end points have reported the prognostic value of estimating viability in patients with heart failure and the impact of revascularization among these patients with varying results. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Because of this uncertainty of the therapeutic value of aggressive interventions in this setting, we performed a propensity analysis on a large cohort to determine…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives to transplantation have been used to improve survival and optimize clinical outcomes. These techniques include dynamic cardiomyoplasty 11 , myocardial revascularization in ischemic DCM 12 , partial left ventriculectomy 13 , biventricular pacemaker insertion 14 and valve reconstruction 3,15 or replacement 4 . FMI is a negative development in the clinical evolution of DCM that increases patient mortality 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%