1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00808414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission tomography as a prognostic tool in coronary artery disease: multivariate analysis in a long-term prospective study

Abstract: To date several studies have evaluated the accuracy of thallium-201 myocardial scan in risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD), while reports using technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI), a tracer particularly suited to single-photon emission tomographic (SPET) imaging, are lacking. To rectify this omission, a prospective study was started in 1988 and at present 176 consecutive, and thus unselected, patients have been enrolled. All of them have been submitted to stress-rest MIBI SPET for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Conversely, the only study addressing risk stratification with AC was by Gibson et al demonstrating the safety of a normal study mainly in a low risk group referred for chest pain. Although the current endorsement for AC by national societies is based on multiple studies demonstrating improved diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant CAD, data providing risk stratification for this procedure are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Conversely, the only study addressing risk stratification with AC was by Gibson et al demonstrating the safety of a normal study mainly in a low risk group referred for chest pain. Although the current endorsement for AC by national societies is based on multiple studies demonstrating improved diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant CAD, data providing risk stratification for this procedure are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%