2015
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial T1 and extracellular volume fraction measurement in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: reproducibility and comparison with age-matched controls

Abstract: The test-retest reproducibility of myocardial T1 quantification using MOLLI is excellent in patients with AS and is highest using inline generated T1 maps for analysis. There was no difference in native myocardial T1 or ECV between asymptomatic patients with moderate-severe AS and age-matched controls without valve disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that ECV markedly overestimates the degree of fibrosis early on, and differentiating patients from aged-matched controls may not be possible, as we have shown in asymptomatic patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis. 8 Further work is also required to confirm that these findings are consistent in women, older athletes, those from sports other than running/cycling/triathlon, and ethnic backgrounds who may be more prone to adverse LV remodeling. Given that preparticipation screening for sports is controversial 20,21 and the high cost of CMR, widespread use in this situation is not indicated.…”
Section: Graham-brown and Mccann T1 Mapping In Athletesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that ECV markedly overestimates the degree of fibrosis early on, and differentiating patients from aged-matched controls may not be possible, as we have shown in asymptomatic patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis. 8 Further work is also required to confirm that these findings are consistent in women, older athletes, those from sports other than running/cycling/triathlon, and ethnic backgrounds who may be more prone to adverse LV remodeling. Given that preparticipation screening for sports is controversial 20,21 and the high cost of CMR, widespread use in this situation is not indicated.…”
Section: Graham-brown and Mccann T1 Mapping In Athletesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Native (before contrast) and post-contrast T1 mapping allow quantification of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV), which correlates with diffuse interstitial fibrosis 7 and is highly robust and reproducible. 8 In addition, native T1 mapping, which reflects the water content of tissues, is a useful imaging tool in many disease states, particularly the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with cardiac amyloidosis. 9 More recently, native T1 mapping has been shown to potentially improve the ability of CMR to differentiate patients with early-stage dilated cardiomyopathy from physiological adaptation to exercise in veteran athletes with low-normal ejection fraction on echocardiography.…”
Section: See Article By Mcdiarmid Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has also been observed in other studies. 57,58,60 Although the prognostic value of extracellular volume fraction has been demonstrated in other patient Figure 5. To date, there are 4 different myocardial T1 mapping techniques used to assess diffuse interstitial fibrosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, the role of myocardial T1 mapping has been well studied in aortic stenosis, with many studies demonstrating a correlation between this marker of diffuse fibrosis and aortic stenosis severity, left ventricular mass, and cardiac performance. [56][57][58][59][60] To date four different T1 mapping approaches have been investigated and validated against the extent of myocardial fibrosis on histology.56,61-66 Each has its own potential advantages and limitations ( Figure 5). In our experience, extracellular volume fraction, which corrects for blood pool and the plasma gadolinium volume of distribution, offers the best reproducibility (including scan-rescan repeatability) and the ability to differentiate patients from healthy volunteers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation