2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20309-6_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial Stiffness Estimation: A Novel Cost Function for Unique Parameter Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use parameters C 2 = 8, C 3 = 3, C 4 = 4 based on Nasopoulou et al [48] and C 1 = 1 kPa to match end-diastolic volume. Meshes were 'deflated' to the reference configuration using the backward displacement method [6].…”
Section: Multi-scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use parameters C 2 = 8, C 3 = 3, C 4 = 4 based on Nasopoulou et al [48] and C 1 = 1 kPa to match end-diastolic volume. Meshes were 'deflated' to the reference configuration using the backward displacement method [6].…”
Section: Multi-scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complex multi-physics and multi-scale cardiac simulations combine models that represent the distinct physiology of the material properties, cellular electrical activity and cellular contraction. When constructing multi-scale models of human function, there are currently many options for characterizing the cellular electrophysiology [19,52] or material properties [66,48]. Detailed biophysical models of cardiac contraction do exist for other species [56,8,36] and have been used to great effect in multi-scale computational models, particularly in the mouse [59,40] and rat [51,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The passive mechanical behavior was governed via the transverse-isotropic strain-energy functional ( 68 ) where E is the Lagrangian strain tensor expressed relative to the muscle fiber and sheet directions and the parameters c 2 = 8, c 3 = 2, and c 4 = 4 characterized the tissue anisotropy ( 69 ). Treating the prefactor c 1 as a phenomenological scaling factor for the overall passive tissue stiffness, we allowed it to vary to preserve the ratios between the different stiffness components.…”
Section: Appendix A: Tissue Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current methodological limitation for the clinical translation is the need for catheterized pressure data (Xi et al 2014). Research is also needed to uniquely identify material parameters, a problem that can be reduced by an adequate choice of the constitutive law (Hadjicharalambous et al 2014;Nasopoulou et al 2015). Other methodologically critical aspects are the choice of a mechanical reference configuration, and the correct temporal alignment of pressure and deformation data.…”
Section: Mechanical Models Decouple Diastolic Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%