2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9183-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events

Abstract: Group 2 had a significantly worse cardiac prognosis compared to Group 1. The annual cardiac death rate of <1% in Group 1 warrants a watchful waiting strategy, whereas the cardiac death rate in Group 2 warrants aggressive invasive coronary strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual cardiac death rate was <1%/year in patients with low-risk MPS whereas this figure was >6%/year for high-risk patients. Patients with a high-risk MPS had much higher cardiac death and non-fatal AMI rate of 18% compared with 4% for those considered at a low risk (p<0.001) [30]. No difference in prognosis between patients with LBBB or RVA pacing was found.…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Mps In Lbbbmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The annual cardiac death rate was <1%/year in patients with low-risk MPS whereas this figure was >6%/year for high-risk patients. Patients with a high-risk MPS had much higher cardiac death and non-fatal AMI rate of 18% compared with 4% for those considered at a low risk (p<0.001) [30]. No difference in prognosis between patients with LBBB or RVA pacing was found.…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Mps In Lbbbmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Of these 2 were not written in the English language, 19 did not assess the prognosis of patients with LBBB or RVA pacing with SPECT and 1 study could not be retrieved from the journal [24]. This left 11 articles for review that were carried out in patients with known or suspected CAD [19][20][21][22][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Two studies from the same investigators with possible double counting or overlap of patients, described the prognostic value of MPS in patients with RVA pacing [20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations