2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70652-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial perfusion assessed by contrast echocardiography correlates with angiographic perfusion parameters in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction successfully treated with angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, another study directly compared MCE and angiographic TIMI myocardial perfusion grade scores in 100 patients undergoing PPCI and the authors found a significant correlation between MCE scores and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade scores [130]. More recently, angiographic indexes of myocardial reperfusion have been associated with the quantification of microvascular obstruction areas, as assessed by CMR.…”
Section: Diagnosis In the Cath-lab: Angiographic And Doppler Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, another study directly compared MCE and angiographic TIMI myocardial perfusion grade scores in 100 patients undergoing PPCI and the authors found a significant correlation between MCE scores and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade scores [130]. More recently, angiographic indexes of myocardial reperfusion have been associated with the quantification of microvascular obstruction areas, as assessed by CMR.…”
Section: Diagnosis In the Cath-lab: Angiographic And Doppler Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, authors of the latter paper [1], have reported almost 60% incidence of signs and symptoms of congestive HF within 6 months after AMI in patients in whom myocardial perfusion was inadequate (MBG 0 and 1) after primary coronary angioplasty. There are also contradictory data and several small studies have reported the lack of correlation between MBG and myocardial perfusion assessed by contrast echocardiography [8,9]. Furthermore, Bertomeu--Gonzalez et al [10] have raised the question on inter-observer variability of MBG assessment, have reported on a lack of correlation between MBG and LVEF assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7) Until recently, the coronary microcirculation has been evaluated by contrast echocardiography, 8) radionucleide imaging, 9) magnetic resonance imaging, 10) computed tomography, 11) electron beam computed tomography, 12) pressure wire, 13) Doppler guidewire, 14) coronary angiography 15) and left ventricular pressure. 16) These techniques can evaluate coronary microcirculation as a whole, but functional evaluation of the individual microvessels has been beyond the scope of these imaging modalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%