1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80767-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial oxygen delivery/consumption during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A comparison of epinephrine and phenylephrine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…68,69 Studies also were performed to compare epinephrine 0.2 mglkg IV with phenylephrine 1 or 10 mglkg administered to swine as previously explained.w" Regional cerebral blood flow was increased in animals receiving epinephrine when compared with those receiving phenylephrine 1 mglkg; there was no difference in cerebral flow when animals receiving epinephrine were compared with those receiving phenylephrine 10 mglkg (p<0.05). 70 In a second study, animals receivingepinephrine demonstrated betterregional myocardial bloodflow than did thosereceiving phenylephrine. Additionally, 80 percent of the swine given epinephrine were resuscitated whereas none in the phenylephrine group survived,"Brillman et al demonstrated no difference in neurologic or cardiovascular outcomes in dogs that received either epinephrine 1 mg or phenylephrine 10 mg IV aftercardiacarrest,"…”
Section: Epinephrine (Adrenalin)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…68,69 Studies also were performed to compare epinephrine 0.2 mglkg IV with phenylephrine 1 or 10 mglkg administered to swine as previously explained.w" Regional cerebral blood flow was increased in animals receiving epinephrine when compared with those receiving phenylephrine 1 mglkg; there was no difference in cerebral flow when animals receiving epinephrine were compared with those receiving phenylephrine 10 mglkg (p<0.05). 70 In a second study, animals receivingepinephrine demonstrated betterregional myocardial bloodflow than did thosereceiving phenylephrine. Additionally, 80 percent of the swine given epinephrine were resuscitated whereas none in the phenylephrine group survived,"Brillman et al demonstrated no difference in neurologic or cardiovascular outcomes in dogs that received either epinephrine 1 mg or phenylephrine 10 mg IV aftercardiacarrest,"…”
Section: Epinephrine (Adrenalin)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, adrenaline and noradrenaline both raise the aortic diastolic pressure by approximately 40 mmHg, whereas other a agonists will not. [28][29][30] The pure at agonists methoxamine and phenylephrine do not result in a consistent significant improvement in aortic diastolic pressure. 29 ,3O There are some differences in rapidity of response in ePR between adrenaline and noradrenaline, which are both at and a2 agonists, and the pure at agonists, which may result from the a2 difference.…”
Section: Adrenergic Stimulation During Cpr (I) Sympathetic Nervous Symentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 1996, Lindner et al reported that plasma AVP concentrations in adults after out-of-hospital car-diac arrest were significantly higher in successfully resuscitated patients compared to unsuccessfully resuscitated patients [6]. Previously studied resuscitation medications such as phenylephrine were proven to be no more effective than epinephrine [7]. Epinephrine, formerly the only first-line medication for treatment of ventricular fibrillation and refractory ventricular tachycardia, has not yet been shown to change outcome and is associated with postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction [8].…”
Section: Role In Cardiopulmonary Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%