2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs Fabry disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one cohort study of patients with HCM and AFD, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurred in 7.5% of AFD patients compared to 0.5% of HCM patients over a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (63). Furthermore, MINOCA was more common among patients with LVH, with MINOCA occurring in 17.7% of patients with LVH compared with 1.7% of patients without LVH (63). AFD was independently associated with MINOCA (OR 6.12) suggesting that MINOCA may represent a red flag for AFD (63).…”
Section: Ischemic Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one cohort study of patients with HCM and AFD, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurred in 7.5% of AFD patients compared to 0.5% of HCM patients over a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (63). Furthermore, MINOCA was more common among patients with LVH, with MINOCA occurring in 17.7% of patients with LVH compared with 1.7% of patients without LVH (63). AFD was independently associated with MINOCA (OR 6.12) suggesting that MINOCA may represent a red flag for AFD (63).…”
Section: Ischemic Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, MINOCA was more common among patients with LVH, with MINOCA occurring in 17.7% of patients with LVH compared with 1.7% of patients without LVH (63). AFD was independently associated with MINOCA (OR 6.12) suggesting that MINOCA may represent a red flag for AFD (63).…”
Section: Ischemic Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite ischaemia being considered a significant contributor to the natural history of HCM [ 3 ], recommendations to assess ischaemic burden are absent from clinical guidelines, and HCM-specific strategies to mitigate ischaemia remain limited. This is in part because the treatment of ischaemia in HCM is complicated by multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, with many patients demonstrating evidence of myocardial infarction in the absence of epicardial coronary stenoses [ 5 8 ], such that multiple other pro-ischaemic mechanisms must be considered alongside therapeutic strategies other than revascularisation [ 6 ]. Despite their importance, the HCM-specific pro-ischaemic mechanisms are not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%