1971
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5746.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial Infarction and Deep-vein Thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 10% increase in uptake which increases over subsequent days (9, 15 % increase in uptake or more for at least two succeeding days (12, 13,20,32,41), 20% increase in uptake (23,35,43) or 30% increase in uptake (30). We found the 15% criterion to be valuable and in good agreement with the results from phlebography on patients with fracture of the femoral neck (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 10% increase in uptake which increases over subsequent days (9, 15 % increase in uptake or more for at least two succeeding days (12, 13,20,32,41), 20% increase in uptake (23,35,43) or 30% increase in uptake (30). We found the 15% criterion to be valuable and in good agreement with the results from phlebography on patients with fracture of the femoral neck (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique the incidence of venous thrombosis in the control group was 29%. This is slightly lower than that reported by other authors (Murray et al, 1970;Maurer et al, 1971;Nicolaides et al, 1971), presumably because they included the high-risk older age group (Maurer et al, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Many authors have reported a high incidence of 125I fibrinogen deep vein thromboses following acute myocardial infarction. Nicolaides et al (22) reported 62% in patients with cardiac decompensation as opposed to 7% in those whose cardiac function remained normal clinically. Warlow et al (23) found a 60% incidence of deep vein thrombosis in the paralyzed limb in 30 patients with a recent cerebral vascular accident while only 7% were positive on the uninvolved side.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%