2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02297-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial blood flow reserve and absolute myocardial blood flow for the assessment of patients with coronary artery disease with or without microvascular dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giubbini (29), but some authors reported higher values, with mean stress MBF of 3.18 ± 0.95, 2.40 ± 0.7, 3.27 ± 1.1, and 2.3 ± 0.97, respectively, for Agostini et al (8), Acampa et al (9,26), and Giubbini et al (10), whereas others observed lower values, with stress MBF of 1.11 (interquartile range, IQR: 1.00-1.26) for Nkoulou et al (7) or 0.67 (IQR, 0.55-0.81) for Zavadovsky et al (30). This discrepancy between values might result from a lack of standardization in terms of software and corrections (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Giubbini (29), but some authors reported higher values, with mean stress MBF of 3.18 ± 0.95, 2.40 ± 0.7, 3.27 ± 1.1, and 2.3 ± 0.97, respectively, for Agostini et al (8), Acampa et al (9,26), and Giubbini et al (10), whereas others observed lower values, with stress MBF of 1.11 (interquartile range, IQR: 1.00-1.26) for Nkoulou et al (7) or 0.67 (IQR, 0.55-0.81) for Zavadovsky et al (30). This discrepancy between values might result from a lack of standardization in terms of software and corrections (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%