2022
DOI: 10.47391/jpma.2297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myelomeningocele among Pakistani population

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the mutation in Vangl1 gene in patients of myelomeningocele. Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2017 to December 2017 in the Dow Diagnostic and Research Laboratory, Karachi, after approval from the ethics review committee of Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, and comprised clinically diagnosed infants and 10 healthy individuals from the outpatient department of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. Several anatomical parameters were considered, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many NTD candidate genes are relatively tolerant of missense variation. For instance, multiple VANGL1 missense variants have been identified in NTD cases, and the pathogenesis of many of these variants has been validated in numerous studies (Bartsch et al 2012 ; Cai et al 2014 ; Cheng et al 2021 ; De Marco et al 2014 ; Doudney et al 2005 ; Fatima et al 2022 ; Humphries et al 2020 ; Iliescu et al 2014 , 2011 ; Kibar et al 2007 , 2009 ; Merello et al 2015 ; Reynolds et al 2010 ; Tian et al 2020a , b ; Wang et al 2018 ). VANGL1 tolerates missense but not loss of function (LOF) variants with a missense Z score of 0.59 but a loss intolerance probability (pLI) scores close to 1 (0.91) and a LOF observed/expected upper bound fraction (LOEUF) score of 0.53.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many NTD candidate genes are relatively tolerant of missense variation. For instance, multiple VANGL1 missense variants have been identified in NTD cases, and the pathogenesis of many of these variants has been validated in numerous studies (Bartsch et al 2012 ; Cai et al 2014 ; Cheng et al 2021 ; De Marco et al 2014 ; Doudney et al 2005 ; Fatima et al 2022 ; Humphries et al 2020 ; Iliescu et al 2014 , 2011 ; Kibar et al 2007 , 2009 ; Merello et al 2015 ; Reynolds et al 2010 ; Tian et al 2020a , b ; Wang et al 2018 ). VANGL1 tolerates missense but not loss of function (LOF) variants with a missense Z score of 0.59 but a loss intolerance probability (pLI) scores close to 1 (0.91) and a LOF observed/expected upper bound fraction (LOEUF) score of 0.53.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an analysis of the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v4.0.0) ( Chen et al 2022 ; Karczewski et al 2020 ) reveals that many NTD candidate genes tolerate missense variation (Supplemental Table 1). For instance, multiple VANGL1 missense variants have been identified in NTD cases and the pathogenesis of many of these variants was validated in experimental assays ( Bartsch et al 2012 ; Cai et al 2014 ; Cheng et al 2021 ; De Marco et al 2014 ; Doudney et al 2005 ; Fatima et al 2022 ; Humphries et al 2020 ; Iliescu et al 2014 ; Iliescu et al 2011 ; Kibar et al 2009 ; Kibar et al 2007 ; Merello et al 2015 ; Reynolds et al 2010 ; Tian et al 2020a ; Tian et al 2020b ; Wang et al 2018 ). VANGL1 tolerates missense but not loss of function (LOF) variants with a missense Z score of 0.59 but a loss intolerance probability (pLI) score close to 1 (0.91) and a LOF observed/expected upper bound fraction (LOEUF) score of 0.53.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%