2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myeloid blastic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms—A review of 112 cases

Abstract: Blastic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is still poorly understood. We describe a cohort of 23 Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) patients and 89 additional cases from the English literature for whom biologic features were described. We initially compared our 23 patients to the 89 cases from the literature. Our population had significantly less patients with prior history of polycythemia vera (PV), shorter time from MPN diagnosis to blastic transformation, <3 prior therapies, more freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data pertaining to the prognostic value of cytogenetics in this patient population are limited, with alterations of chromosome 17 and the number of cytogenetic abnormalities having been shown to predict survival in separate reports. 2,4 In the present study, both were associated with poor prognosis, as was the broader MRC category of adverse cytogenetics. Although prognostic factors identified within the whole cohort of patients provide some value, this group was comprised of individuals treated with regimens ranging from strict supportive care to HCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data pertaining to the prognostic value of cytogenetics in this patient population are limited, with alterations of chromosome 17 and the number of cytogenetic abnormalities having been shown to predict survival in separate reports. 2,4 In the present study, both were associated with poor prognosis, as was the broader MRC category of adverse cytogenetics. Although prognostic factors identified within the whole cohort of patients provide some value, this group was comprised of individuals treated with regimens ranging from strict supportive care to HCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) occurs in ;5% to 10% of cases after 10 y and is associated with exceptionally poor prognosis. [1][2][3][4][5] At present, our understanding of the optimal treatment strategy for patients who undergo leukemic transformation (LT; also referred to as MPN-blast phase 5 ) is limited. In a retrospective analysis of 91 patients with AML arising from myelofibrosis, the median survival from the time of LT was 2.6 mo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1), certain groups of AML patients, including the elderly, those with therapy-associated disease, and patients with prior chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a particularly poor response to conventional cytarabine/anthracycline-based therapy and have an unmet clinical need (2-4). For example, patients with AML that arises in the setting of prior myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia have a 41% response rate (all regressing to prior chronic phase MPN and not meeting conventional CR criteria for AML) with conventional therapy but only a 9% 1-year survival (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JAK2 mutations are rare in AML, but the majority of AMLs have activated STAT3 and/or STAT5, which may be due to aberrations in signaling molecules upstream of STAT, such as FLT3 [70]. However, AML is a common complication stemming from MPNs [71]. The efficacy of ruxolitinib in treating relapsed/refractory AML and ALL was studied in a Phase II trial.…”
Section: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Aml)mentioning
confidence: 99%