2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-021-00810-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of consistent relations between soil C/N ratio, F/B ratio and pH with EcM tree abundance in our dataset does not support this hypothesis. In addition, previous studies found no differences in litter chemistry (Averill, 2016; Keller & Phillips, 2019) nor litter decay rates (Keller & Phillips, 2019; Seyfried et al, 2021) between tropical AM and EcM plant species. SOM decomposition : Generally, the lower C and nutrient concentrations found in EcM stands could be related to faster SOM transformation rates. However, the decrease in the total biomass of bacteria may indicate that the rate and magnitude of C and nutrient transformation processes are lower in EcM tropical forests than in AM forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of consistent relations between soil C/N ratio, F/B ratio and pH with EcM tree abundance in our dataset does not support this hypothesis. In addition, previous studies found no differences in litter chemistry (Averill, 2016; Keller & Phillips, 2019) nor litter decay rates (Keller & Phillips, 2019; Seyfried et al, 2021) between tropical AM and EcM plant species. SOM decomposition : Generally, the lower C and nutrient concentrations found in EcM stands could be related to faster SOM transformation rates. However, the decrease in the total biomass of bacteria may indicate that the rate and magnitude of C and nutrient transformation processes are lower in EcM tropical forests than in AM forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The lack of consistent relations between soil C/N ratio, F/B ratio and pH with EcM tree abundance in our dataset does not support this hypothesis. In addition, previous studies found no differences in litter chemistry (Averill, 2016;Keller & Phillips, 2019) nor litter decay rates (Keller & Phillips, 2019;Seyfried et al, 2021) between tropical AM and EcM plant species.…”
Section: Biogeochemical Patterns In Tropical Ecm Forestsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, dominant species in SL, PF, MF, and NSF belong to different life types, shrub, coniferous species, mixed needle–broad-leaved species, and broad-leaved species, respectively. Meanwhile, litter quality and quantity and mycorrhizal types also showed obvious difference in ecological and biological attributes [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Therefore, according to the results of this study, the selection of dominant species adapted to low soil moisture and available phosphorus and the construction of plant communities based on selected species can effectively drive community assembly and ecosystem functions in the vegetation restoration process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EM-dominated sites, organic matter accumulates in the soil due to a low decomposition rate, while mycorrhizal uptake of N directly from organic matter reduces inorganic N availability (Lin et al, 2017;Phillips et al, 2013). However, differences in organic matter accumulation and N availability can appear even when decomposition rates are similar for litter produced by AM and EM trees (Kyaschenko et al, 2017;Seyfried et al, 2021). Reductions in N availability and increases in organic matter have also been observed at 1,000 m a.s.l., associated with the EM tree O. mexicana when compared to nearby mixed forest (Corrales et al, 2016;Dalling et al, 2021).…”
Section: Differences In Soil Chemistry and Physical Properties Between Adjacent Oak And Mixed Forest Standsmentioning
confidence: 96%