2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11686-023-00683-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycoplasma wenyonii and Candidatus Mycoplasma Haemobos in Pastoralists Cattle in Nigeria

Joshua Kamani,
Mike Shand,
Audu Shekaro
et al.

Abstract: The extensive migration practiced by pastoralists cattle exposes them to a variety of pathogens and vectors which may sometimes lead to severe disease outcomes. Moreover, the synergistic effect of multiple parasitism on the productivity of livestock has been well recognized. This is particularly true where the livestock production system predisposes the animals to constant and heavy infestation with arthropod vectors. Methods:The presences, prevalence and risk factors for hemotropic Mycoplasma (hemoplasma) inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, the infection rates of M. wenyonii and C. M. haemobos were 20.2% and 3.8%, respectively, suggesting that M. wenyonii is more prevalent in Korean native cattle than C. M. haemobos . The prevalence of C. M. haemobos in Korean native cattle was relatively low compared with that in other countries [ 18 , 21 , 29 , 34 37 ]. Moreover, in the current study, C. M. haemobos was detected only in grazing cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to our results, the infection rates of M. wenyonii and C. M. haemobos were 20.2% and 3.8%, respectively, suggesting that M. wenyonii is more prevalent in Korean native cattle than C. M. haemobos . The prevalence of C. M. haemobos in Korean native cattle was relatively low compared with that in other countries [ 18 , 21 , 29 , 34 37 ]. Moreover, in the current study, C. M. haemobos was detected only in grazing cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%