2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-013-9499-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycophenolate Versus Cyclophosphamide for Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Systemic Sclerosis: A 2-Year Case Control Study

Abstract: Although these results derive from patients selected for receiving at least 1 year of treatment and therefore they do not represent an intention-to-treat cohort, an eagerness to replace cyclophosphamide by mycophenolate in SSc-associated ILD treatment is not supported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this meta-analysis show that mycophenolate is a safe therapeutic agent and its administration has been linked with stabilisation of lung functional parameters. A prospective study in which patients treated with MMF were matched 1:1 with patients treated with CYC, showed a deterioration of lung HRCT at 2 years after MMF treatment but not after CYC, despite the fact that patients treated with CYC had more extensive ILD at baseline [60]. While awaiting the results of a multicentre randomised clinical trial, the Scleroderma Lung Study II, which aims to compare the functional effect of MMF with oral CYC in patients with SSc-ILD, MMF is generally used as a maintenance treatment after CYC and is only occasionally employed as an induction treatment [61].…”
Section: Nonselective Immunosuppressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this meta-analysis show that mycophenolate is a safe therapeutic agent and its administration has been linked with stabilisation of lung functional parameters. A prospective study in which patients treated with MMF were matched 1:1 with patients treated with CYC, showed a deterioration of lung HRCT at 2 years after MMF treatment but not after CYC, despite the fact that patients treated with CYC had more extensive ILD at baseline [60]. While awaiting the results of a multicentre randomised clinical trial, the Scleroderma Lung Study II, which aims to compare the functional effect of MMF with oral CYC in patients with SSc-ILD, MMF is generally used as a maintenance treatment after CYC and is only occasionally employed as an induction treatment [61].…”
Section: Nonselective Immunosuppressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several reports from small case series describe a positive outcome in SSc-ILD patients treated with MMF, with stabilization or mild improvement of PFTs and HRCT fibrosis after 6 up to 24 months of therapy [84][85][86][87][88]. Stabilization of lung function has also been observed in a recent, uncontrolled, prospective study including early, immunosuppressive therapy-naive dcSSc patients, with a median treatment duration of 18 months [89].…”
Section: Mycophenolatementioning
confidence: 84%
“…A case-control study of patients with SSc-ILD treated with MMF was compared with cyclophosphamide-treated patients (matched for age, gender, baseline FVC) [54]. No change in PFTs was seen, but decline in HRCT was seen in the MMF-treated group.…”
Section: Mycophenolate Mofetil (Mmf)mentioning
confidence: 99%