2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00337-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycophenolate mofetil in stable liver transplant patients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, conversion of patients from CI to MMF resulted in improvement in renal function. Those patients who did not require dialysis had either stable or improved renal function, and our data are consistent with the observations made by many other investigators9–12, 31 who have shown improvement in renal function upon withdrawal of CI. Of the 4 patients who required dialysis before or after conversion to MMF, 3 were felt clinically and/or pathologically to have renal failure due to CI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, conversion of patients from CI to MMF resulted in improvement in renal function. Those patients who did not require dialysis had either stable or improved renal function, and our data are consistent with the observations made by many other investigators9–12, 31 who have shown improvement in renal function upon withdrawal of CI. Of the 4 patients who required dialysis before or after conversion to MMF, 3 were felt clinically and/or pathologically to have renal failure due to CI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The role of MMF in the liver transplant population has traditionally been in the immediate posttransplant period. However, recently it has been used as a CI‐sparing drug in patients who developed renal insufficiency 9–12. Although MMF monotherapy is a very attractive option for liver transplant recipients, the efficacy of MMF as monotherapy has been questioned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were: recipients younger than 18 yr, stable liver function tests with at least 12 months of transplantation, no acute rejection at least six months before the study, no chronic rejection biopsy-proven in the last six months and no renal disease before transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as: creatinine clearance of <80 mL/min (normal range: 80-120), serum creatinine level >1.0 mg/dL (normal range: 0.3-1.0), azotemia (BUN) >21 mg/dL (normal range: 9-21) and uric acid concentration ‡6.5 mg/dL (normal range: [3][4][5][6]. None of the patients had hypertension at the initiation of the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cell cycle, MMF acts later than CNIs and may act synergistically with them (3). Because of these advantages, MMF has been increasingly used after OLT in adults and children in order to promote decreased risks of toxic side effects of CNIs (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). However, few studies have evaluated the long-term use of this drug in children with renal dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various CNI‐sparing immunosuppressive strategies have been explored in liver transplant recipients who exhibit deteriorating renal function while on CNI therapy. Small prospective studies have indicated that the introduction of mycophenolic acid (MPA) with CNI reduction or elimination can improve or even normalize limited renal function in many patients 9–13. Complete withdrawal of CNI therapy in MPA‐treated patients, however, is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection9, 10: in a study of 28 liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction in whom CNI was withdrawn and replaced with MPA monotherapy, there was a 21% incidence of rejection within the following 6 months versus no rejection episodes in controls who remained on a CNI 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%