2016
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycophenolate mofetil combined with systemic corticosteroids prevents progression to chronic recurrent inflammation and development of ‘sunset glow fundus’ in initial‐onset acute uveitis associated with Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease

Abstract: Use of MMF as first-line therapy combined with systemic corticosteroids in patients with initial-onset acute VKH disease prevents progression to chronic recurrent granulomatous inflammation and development of 'sunset glow fundus'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
65
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this classification did not consider time from the onset of symptoms, and specific findings observed at certain time point from the symptoms presentation and outcomes related to the stage of VKH disease were not introduced [ 13 , 16 ]. Moreover, as an attempt to introduce a categorization of VKH patients in clinical studies, different intervals of time have been used [ 5 , 14 , 17 20 ]. Another major shortcoming of these revised criteria is the fact that highly sensitive diagnostic modalities, such as indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) [ 21 ], measurement of choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) [ 22 ] or swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) [ 23 ], and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) for in vivo visualization of the anterior segment [ 24 ], especially crucial for early identification of the inflammatory process, diagnosis of atypical cases and follow up of the disease, are missing.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this classification did not consider time from the onset of symptoms, and specific findings observed at certain time point from the symptoms presentation and outcomes related to the stage of VKH disease were not introduced [ 13 , 16 ]. Moreover, as an attempt to introduce a categorization of VKH patients in clinical studies, different intervals of time have been used [ 5 , 14 , 17 20 ]. Another major shortcoming of these revised criteria is the fact that highly sensitive diagnostic modalities, such as indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) [ 21 ], measurement of choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) [ 22 ] or swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) [ 23 ], and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) for in vivo visualization of the anterior segment [ 24 ], especially crucial for early identification of the inflammatory process, diagnosis of atypical cases and follow up of the disease, are missing.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, up till now there has been no agreement neither in the terminology nor in the development of clear and explicit definitions for the different VKH courses described here. In this regard, patients with an early course of the condition at diagnosis have been classified as having an early [ 15 ], a new onset-acute [ 19 ], an acute-resolved [ 31 ], an acute VKH disease [ 18 ] or an initial-onset acute VKH disease [ 8 , 17 ]. On the other hand, subjects with late presentation have been referred to as subacute [ 2 , 34 ], chronic [ 17 , 26 , 35 ] or late [ 7 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Different Definitions Of Initial-onset Acute and Chronic Recmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations