1996
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycobacterium tuberculosisComplex DNA in Ancient Human Bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ampli®ca-tion of the complete insertion sequence IS6110 may result in a false-positive result, several contemporary studies have shown that, in particular, the ampli®ca-tion of the 123-bp fragment used in the present study provided results speci®c for the M. tuberculosis complex [31,32]. A further study on archival bone specimens of c. 100 years of age also provided a speci®c positive ampli®cation product with this sequence only for the M. tuberculosis complex, but not for other mycobacteria (particularly ubiquitous soil mycobacteria), such as M. gordonae or M. aurum [4]. In the three cases with typical morphological features of tuberculosis in the study series, only two cases with molecularly con®rmed tuberculosis were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although the ampli®ca-tion of the complete insertion sequence IS6110 may result in a false-positive result, several contemporary studies have shown that, in particular, the ampli®ca-tion of the 123-bp fragment used in the present study provided results speci®c for the M. tuberculosis complex [31,32]. A further study on archival bone specimens of c. 100 years of age also provided a speci®c positive ampli®cation product with this sequence only for the M. tuberculosis complex, but not for other mycobacteria (particularly ubiquitous soil mycobacteria), such as M. gordonae or M. aurum [4]. In the three cases with typical morphological features of tuberculosis in the study series, only two cases with molecularly con®rmed tuberculosis were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The exception to this was IS6110, with a first-round amplicon size of 123 bp and a size of 92 bp after nesting. This method is exquisitely sensitive for detecting tuberculosis DNA and is usually the first to be applied for identifying cases in archaeological studies (1,12,27). However, given the difference in sensitivities between IS6110 and other methods, there is clearly still a need for confirmatory tests for this pathogen in archaeological material and also for those which will provide useful genotyping data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In all cases, the DNA was preserved in excellent condition. The DNA was extracted from aliquots of 0.3 g of pulverized bone material through a phenol-chloroform-based method, 23 which was previously found to be particularly suitable for DNA extraction from long-term buried skeletal material containing humic acids. 13 The sequence in question on chromosome 3 at p21.3 was amplified by PCR using primers that were designed to yield a 130 bp product for CCR5 wild type and a 98 bp fragment for the CCR5-D32 mutation.…”
Section: Ccr5-d32mentioning
confidence: 99%