2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-010-0423-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis as a template in the evaluation of automated kits for DNA extraction from bovine organs

Abstract: Molecular diagnostic tests are widely implemented in animal and human health microbiology. Efficient nucleic acid extraction methods are essential in diagnostic laboratories and automation is a valuable tool for those with high throughput activity. Nucleic acid extraction protocols present variable efficiency depending on the composition of the specimen and the chemical-physical characteristics of the target pathogen. In the present study, we compared the DNA extraction performances of four automated methods (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same PCR protocol was used for both confirmatory test and direct analysis. In brief, 300 μl of supernatant or culture medium was subjected to a bead-beating step in order to enhance MAP DNA recovery as previously described ( 36 ). DNA extraction was performed manually with the High Pure PCR preparation kit (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany) or by the automated MagMAX™ 96 Viral Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, USA) using the Microlab Starlet automated extraction platform (Hamilton Robotics, Bonaduz, Switzerland) or the KingFisher Flex instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Worcester, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same PCR protocol was used for both confirmatory test and direct analysis. In brief, 300 μl of supernatant or culture medium was subjected to a bead-beating step in order to enhance MAP DNA recovery as previously described ( 36 ). DNA extraction was performed manually with the High Pure PCR preparation kit (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany) or by the automated MagMAX™ 96 Viral Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, USA) using the Microlab Starlet automated extraction platform (Hamilton Robotics, Bonaduz, Switzerland) or the KingFisher Flex instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Worcester, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual fecal samples were collected from the rectal ampulla and analyzed applying microbiological and molecular diagnostic methods for MAP identification. All samples were processed for testing by IS900 direct real-time PCR (qPCR, Applied Biosystems, Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel, The Netherlands) according to Pozzato et al ( 28 , 29 ) while the culture was carried out by a double decontamination method on modified Middlebrook 7H9 liquid media (7H9+). After 6 weeks of culture, 7H9+ broths were examined by Ziehl-Nielsen staining and real-time PCR, as reported by our previous work (27a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%